MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405365835 · doi:10.3138/cjpe-2023-0036

The Evaluation and Research of the Somatic Archaeology Model <sup>©</sup>

2023· article· en· W4405365835 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Program Evaluation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchaeologySomatic cellEnvironmental scienceHistoryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Somatic Archaeology Model© (SAM©) is a transgenerational trauma recovery technique and modality developed by Dr. Ruby Gibson. SAM© techniques are based on epigenetic transmission, emerging neuroscience, somatic expression, biological and moral conflicts, stress management, biogeneaology, and earth-centred, kin-centric models for spiritual wholeness. SAM© creates profound shifts in one’s hormonal, physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual well-being. Relevant to our Native American and Indigenous communities, the purpose of Freedom Lodge non-profit is to provide individual, group, and cultural wellness opportunities/trainings related to historical trauma and the genocide of Native American (NA) Peoples. Our communities are suffering from survival stress, poverty, and grief, often related to loss of homelands, language, relatives, and culture, along with the government / church establishment of Residential Boarding Schools for Native American youth in 1960s–1970s. The goal of residential schools was to “kill the Indian in the child” through confinement, Christianity, loss of contact with family members, sexual assault, and the diminution of language, dress, identity, and beliefs. These complex, violent, and obscure government actions established multiple generations of suffering. To offset these deeply embedded, painful memories, tribal members succumb to the use of alcohol, drugs, violence, sexual assault, gangs, and youth suicide. Freedom Lodge’s goal is to provide an alternative to the “numbing” of memories, which we refer to as Reconciliation. The 5 Steps of SAM© are as follows: I Notice, I Sense, I Feel, I Interpret, and I Reconcile. One of our goals is to simplify trauma recovery for all people by utilizing earth-centred principles to not only reclaim one’s sense of self and purpose but also to align with Mother Earth to heal the deepest wounds. Evaluation of SAM© and the Historical Trauma Master Class (HTMC) sheds light on these concerns, while evaluating student needs, technique refinement, benefits of SAM©, cultural support, and application of SAM© techniques. The communities that Freedom Lodge has served over the past eight years have experienced a reduction in youth suicide, reduction in addictive tendencies, ease in personal and familial relationships, heartfelt connections with their ancestors, stronger bonds with their children, relief from long-standing pain and physical concerns, Native pride, cultural connections, and renewed hope for the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.523
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Program EvaluationSame topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207