MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405366456 · doi:10.1111/cid.13427

Extended Platelet‐Rich Fibrin as a Membrane for Lateral Window Sinus Lifts: A Case Series

2024· article· en· W4405366456 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nathan E. Estrin, Hussein Basma, Alan Rene Espinoza, Miguel Pinto, Michael A. Pikos, Richard J. Miron

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlatelet-rich fibrinMedicineMaxillary sinusResorptionSinus (botany)DentistryBone graftingAlveolar ridgeRadiographySurgeryPlatelet-rich plasmaFibrinImplantPlateletInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is being increasingly utilized in surgical procedures due to various improvements in clinical outcomes. More recently, a heating process to denature albumin in the platelet poor plasma (PPP) layer has been shown to extend the resorption time of PRF from a typical 2-week period to 4-6 months. Because of its > 4 month resorption properties, extended PRF (e-PRF) membranes have been used in dentistry as an alternative to collagen membranes in alveolar ridge preservations, ridge augmentations, soft tissue grafting, and as a barrier membrane in lateral sinus grafting procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 patients from 3 different clinical facilities participated in this multicenter case series study. All clinicians completed a standard lateral window sinus technique with sticky bone utilizing allograft, xenograft, or autologous dentin with an e-PRF membrane utilized for sole coverage of the lateral window. The survival rate at second stage implant surgery (~6 months) and radiographic analysis determined on consecutive radiographs: (1) the mean residual bone height (RBH) under the maxillary sinus at implant placement and (2) the change in endosinus bone level, were calculated to assess the endosinus bone changes at 6 months. RESULTS: Between June 2022 and December 2023, 22 patients were included in this study. Patients included 12 women and 10 men with a mean age of 58.8 years, ranging from 32 to 78 years. In 22 lateral window sinuses completed, a total of 31 implants were placed. All patients healed uneventfully without any post-operative complications. Post-op CBCTs were taken at 6 months to demonstrate successful sinus floor augmentation and to calculate endosinus gain. No soft tissue invagination was encountered in any of the study participants nor displacement of the graft material into the buccal mucosa. In one case highlighted in this study, the e-PRF membrane was utilized to repair a sinus perforation. The average 6-month post-operative sinus height was 12.3 mm with a mean change in endosinus bone gain of 8.0 mm. CONCLUSION: Utilizing extended-PRF membranes in place of collagen membranes for coverage of the lateral window during sinus floor elevation was shown to be a successful treatment modality in this case series. These findings provide new opportunities utilizing denatured albumin membranes in implant dentistry and paves the way for additional applications. The material is 100% autologous, low cost. This is the first case series study highlighting its novel use for coverage of the lateral window during sinus grafting. Larger longitudinal studies are now needed with comparison to standard resorbable membranes as well as long-term follow-up of implants placed into sites grafted with e-PRF membranes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchSame topicPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207