Effect of conventional and digital methods and aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with temporary crowns based on aged PMMA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary crowns (TC) was investigated. TC were manufactured using conventional and digital methods (CAD/CAM milling, 3D printing) and then subjected to cyclic aging (5, 000 cycles). Surface roughness (Ra) and contact angle of polished and abrasive blasted TC were determined before and after aging. Data analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and repeated measures, and LSD in post-hoc tests (α=0.05). After surface treat ment, there was a significant increase in Ra of conventional and milled TC (p<0.001), while 3D printed showed a slight increase in Ra (p=0.073). The contact angle of polished TC surfaces was significantly different (p>0.05), and after surface treatment the differences in contact angle were small (p<0.001). Aesthetic orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary crowns, regardless of the production method, have adequate bond strength before and after aging, with the exception of 3D printed TCs after aging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".