MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405372105 · doi:10.3390/jcm13247595

The Long-Term Cardiovascular Risks of Duloxetine Use in Older Adults: A Retrospective Medical Record-Based Adverse Drug Reaction Assessment

2024· article· en· W4405372105 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuqi Cui, Sayed Aliul Hasan Abdi, Jeanne Y. Wei, Gohar Azhar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Arkansas for Medical SciencesUniversity of Arkansas
KeywordsDuloxetineMedicineDepression (economics)Medical recordAnxietyAdverse effectFibromyalgiaInternal medicinePolypharmacyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Duloxetine, a Serotonin–Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor (SNRI), is frequently used to treat diabetic peripheral neuropathy, depression, and fibromyalgia. However, its long-term cardiovascular implications in older individuals remain underexplored, particularly in those with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases. This medical record assessment aimed to evaluate the potential cardiovascular risks of duloxetine use in older persons after prolonged use. Methods: We evaluated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) using six medical records from elderly individuals (aged 70–79) with cardiovascular comorbidities who received duloxetine (≥60 mg daily) for anxiety, depression, and chronic pain. ADRs were assessed using the Naranjo ADR Probability Scale, the Modified Hartwig and Siegel Severity Scale, and the Karch and Lasagna Algorithm. Clinical outcomes were assessed before and after duloxetine dose reduction or withdrawal. Results: All the patients had cardiovascular-related ADRs, such as peripheral cyanosis, vasoconstriction, atrial fibrillation, and hypertensive episodes. Five of the six patients experienced mild cognitive impairment [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores of 11–24/30]. A positive dechallenge (symptom resolution) was observed in all medical records after decreasing or discontinuing duloxetine. It is interesting to note that four medical records demonstrated significant improvement in cyanosis, blood pressure, and anxiety after decreasing or discontinuing duloxetine use. There was no rechallenge in this study. The causality was considered probable (Naranjo Scale), and ADRs were categorized as moderately severe (Hartwig and Siegel Scale) in all the medical records. However, with adequate monitoring, the ADRs were considered preventable (Schumock and Thornton Scale). Conclusions: Long-term duloxetine use could cause significant cardiovascular problems in older individuals, particularly those who already have cardiovascular difficulties. Regular monitoring of cardiovascular function and early steps such as dose adjustment or drug withdrawal of duloxetine may reduce the prognosis of ADRs. More studies are required to create safer treatment strategies for managing depression and anxiety in older people with cardiovascular issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MedicineSame topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207