MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405374985 · doi:10.1016/j.iotech.2024.100845

102P A real-world study of the efficacy of second-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after progression on first-line lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor

2024· article· en· W4405374985 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Li, Qi Wen, Wen‐Tsung Huang, Long Feng, Yi Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueImmuno-Oncology Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLenvatinibHepatocellular carcinomaMedicineOncologyInternal medicineSecond lineLine (geometry)First lineSorafenib

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Blood vascular angiosarcoma is an uncommon and aggressive malignancy that has responded well to several combinations of immunotherapy.Conventional medicines like radiation and chemotherapy are not very successful, however immunotherapies such bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab, epacadostat + pembrolizumab, and Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown positive outcomes in certain individuals.Ipilimumab + nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have also demonstrated promise in slowing the course of the illness and raising survival rates.Methods: This study was conducted based on PRISMA reporting guidelines.All included studies were derived from PubMed, Sciencedirect, NEJM, and Europe PMC databases using a set of keywords: Angiosarcoma, Pembrolizumab, and Immunotherapies.Studies were extracted and evaluated based on inclusion (Accessible full text, Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trials, and last 5 years) and exclusion criterias (non-english text, animal studies, case report, systematic reviews, and meta analysis) The quality of included studies were further assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).Results: Seven studies consisting of RCTs and clinical trials were included, screening a total of 195 patients.Among the seven studies, bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab yields 0.60 (95% Cl; 0.08-4.40;P < 0.00001), epacadostat + pembrolizumab yields 0.03 (95% Cl; 0.00-0.29;P < 0.00001), ipilimumab + nivolumab yields 0.33 (95% Cl; 0.07-1.49;P < 0.00001), pembrolizumab alone yields 3.33 (95% Cl; 0.36-30.70;P < 0.00001), and Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) yields 0.13 (95% Cl; 0.02-0.71;P < 0.00001) Adverse effect wise is 17.00 (95% Cl; 0.74-391.68;P < 0.00001), 0.30 (95% Cl; 0.10-0.92;P < 0.00001), 3.00 (95% Cl; 0.67-13.40;P < 0.00001), 0.09 (95% Cl; 0.00-2.07;P < 0.00001), and 5.00 (95% Cl; 1.07-23.46;P < 0.00001), respectively.Conclusions: This research shows that monotherapy drugs, pembrolizumab alone, are better than other combinations and ICIs in terms of ORR and adverse effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmuno-Oncology TechnologySame topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisFrench-language works237,207