MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405374998 · doi:10.1016/j.iotech.2024.100749

120MO Inupadenant combined with chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous NSCLC progressing on or after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Results from dose-finding part of the A2A-005 trial

2024· article· en· W4405374998 on OpenAlexaff
Kristof Cuppens, G. Lo Russo, Óscar Juan, E. Felip, Ma Carmen Areses Manrique, Alberto Chiappori, E. Govaerts, P.K. Cheema, L. Greillier, L. Toschi, Eric Schaefer, M. Clouseau, C. Martinoli, Hussein Shehade, Natalie Byrne, M. Fox, M. Rossetti, Olivier De Henau, S. Ross, S. Peters

Bibliographic record

VenueImmuno-Oncology Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsWilliam Osler Health SystemBrampton Civic Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOncologyChemotherapyInternal medicineImmune checkpointImmune systemImmunotherapyImmunologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: PDC*lung01 (IMP) is an innovative therapeutic cancer vaccine, synergistic with anti-PD-1, based on an irradiated plasmacytoid dendritic cell line loaded with HLA-A*02:01-restricted peptides (NY-ESO-1, MAGE-A3, MAGE-A4, Multi-MAGE-A, MUC1, Survivin and Melan-A), able to prime and expand antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in vitro and in vivo.Methods: This phase I/II study (NCT03970746) enrolled HLA-A*02 positive NSCLC pts in 4 cohorts: 2 cohorts with IMP in resected stage II/IIIA in adjuvant setting following SoC (low A1 and high dose A2) and 2 cohorts with IMP plus pembrolizumab 200 mg q3w in untreated stage IV NSCLC with PD-L150% and no targetable driver mutation (low B1 and high-dose B2).IMP was administered by SC and IV routes weekly for 6 consecutive doses.We report cohort B2 efficacy results of the 42 evaluable pts from the designed per protocol population: objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS).Results: At this data cut-off, the last pt reached 9 months (mo) follow-up (FU) with a median FU of 19.5mo (95%CI 13.8-25.6).Confirmed ORR was 55% (80%CI 43.7%-65.4%)reaching the predefined target (15% increase compared to Keynote-042).The 9mPFS was 49% (80%CI 38.5%;58.3%),and mature median PFS reached 8.87mo (95% CI 4.3-23.6)(Table ).An antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell response was induced in 56% of pts.Remarkable expansions of anti-tumor CD8 +T-cells up to 2.3% of total CD8+T-cells were observed.Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were mostly grade 1-2 with one grade 4 allergic infusion-related reaction.Fourteen pts experienced a serious AE, 3 considered related to the IMP.Conclusions: This primary analysis shows that PDC*lung01 + pembrolizumab may provide a meaningful clinical activity compared to anti-PD1 alone, with a mild safety profile.PDC*lung01 is biologically active inducing strong immune response in a significant proportion of pts.Clinical trial identification: NCT03970746.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmuno-Oncology TechnologySame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207