MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405377521 · doi:10.1111/taja.12529

Unsettled and unsettling tourism landscapes of Timor‐Leste

2024· article· en· W4405377521 on OpenAlexafffund
Amy Rothschild, Susana Barnes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Australian Journal of Anthropology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsTourismColonialismIndependence (probability theory)Context (archaeology)NegotiationPoliticsSociologyPolitical economyVisionModernitySociocultural evolutionPolitical scienceGender studiesGeographySocial scienceAnthropologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This special issue explores how tourism in Timor-Leste operates as a dynamic arena for negotiating the nation's post-independence identity, development priorities, and nation-building processes. The papers in this collection illuminate the ways in which Timorese communities and stakeholders navigate competing visions of the nation's future, balancing tradition and modernity, while contending with the enduring legacies of conflict and colonisation. Moving beyond conventional framings of tourism as an economic driver, this issue foregrounds tourism's sociocultural and political dimensions. Tourism emerges here as a critical medium through which national, cultural, and historical identities are actively shaped, contested, and reimagined. The issue builds on discussions from the panel, Unsettled and Unsettling Tourism Landscapes of Timor-Leste, presented at the 2022 American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting in Seattle. Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives and anthropological approaches (see Leite & Graburn, 2009; Nogués-Pedregal, 2019; Salazar & Graburn, 2014), the contributors explore tourism as a multifaceted field where local dynamics are interpreted and adapted, offering critical insights into the complex processes of cultural preservation, identity negotiation, and development in a post-conflict, post-colonial context. By adopting this broad lens, the issue offers an innovative framework for understanding tourism's role in Timor-Leste's post-independence era. Timor-Leste's paths to independence and economic self-sufficiency have been long and hard-fought, with the latter struggle still ongoing. Colonised by Portugal to varying degrees over a span of more than 450 years, ‘Portuguese Timor’ remained on the margins of the colonial empire, with limited governance and infrastructure development well into the mid-20th century (Clarence-Smith, 1985). In the late 19th century, colonial administration and economic exploitation intensified as Portugal sought to solidify its authority amid competition with the Dutch (Pélissier, 1996). As Portugal faced a wave of decolonisation following the Carnation Revolution in April 1974, the Timorese declared independence in 1975. This was followed almost immediately by a 24-year occupation by Indonesia, characterised by violence, repression, and significant socioeconomic upheaval (CAVR, 2005). In 1999, a UN-sponsored referendum led to a vote for independence, prompting violent reprisals. Full international recognition followed in 2002, initiating a period of post-conflict rebuilding that continues to influence the nation's economic and social strategies. The post-conflict years that followed independence required substantial rebuilding, with an economy heavily dependent on oil and gas revenues. Today, however, declining petroleum reserves highlight the urgent need for economic diversification. Currently, nearly 80% of Timor-Leste's state budget is funded by its Petroleum Fund, raising concerns over a potential ‘fiscal cliff’ as revenue falls short of growing public expenditure (Lao Hamutuk, 2023; Neves et al., 2023; Scheiner, 2021). This situation is further complicated by reliance on imports, high unemployment rates, and significant poverty levels, with 48.3% of the population experiencing multidimensional poverty (World Food Program, 2023). The Government has responded by prioritising tourism, agriculture, and manufacturing as key areas for growth. Tourism, in particular, has been positioned as a potential economic lifeline for the country, with an emphasis on Timor-Leste's rich natural and cultural assets, including coral reefs and mountainous terrain, as well as a plethora of historical sites (Edyvane et al., 2012; Marx, 2016; Tourism Policy, 2017; Currie, 2016, 2020). Guided by the National Tourism Policy: Growing Tourism to 2030, Timor-Leste's Government envisions tourism as a cornerstone of Timor's economy, with an explicit aim to attract 200,000 international visitors and generate $150 million annually by 2030 (Tourism Policy, 2017). Yet Timor's tourism sector has been hindered by a lack of human resource capacity, infrastructural constraints, limited international connectivity, and lingering perceptions tied to past instability (Currie, 2016; World Bank, 2021; Mendonça et al., 2023). Beyond this, there are contested visions of what tourism should look like. Drawing on familiar examples from neighbouring Indonesia, some imagine a modernist landscape of high-rise beachside resorts replete with golf courses and infinity pools, while others look to eco-friendly sustainable models of tourism that capitalise on the idea of ‘undiscovered’ landscapes and ‘pristine’ seascapes (Currie, 2016; Currie & Turner, 2014). These disparate visions not only highlight different economic priorities, they also expose broader social and political divides, including generational and ideological rifts over questions of national identity and development. Tourism in Timor-Leste thus becomes a focal point for debates on identity, inequality, and representation. Despite the tensions and high expectations surrounding tourism in the country, to date the sector has received limited scholarly attention, with most research on tourism in Timor-Leste confined to fields like tourism studies, economics, and business management (see Berno et al., 2022; Dutra et al., 2016; Tolkach et al., 2012, among others). This research, which tends to emphasise tourism's economic impacts, market potential, and development prospects, leaves substantial gaps in understanding tourism's complex effects on identity, local agency, and power relations within host communities. This special issue aims to fill in these gaps by using anthropological and interdisciplinary frameworks to explore how Timor-Leste's tourism landscapes serve not merely as potential sites of economic development, but as sites of negotiation, where various actors, including local communities, government, and international stakeholders, engage in contested visions of development, cultural preservation, and national identity. In light of the global shifts in tourism brought about by the pandemic, this collection provides a timely exploration of tourism's possibilities and tensions, examining how this evolving industry holds both promise and complexity within an uncertain global future. The special issue brings together contributions from four anthropologists and one political scientist, all of whom interrogate questions of tourism in Timor-Leste through the lenses of their particular long-term research projects in Timor-Leste, projects which span the topics of culture, tradition, gender, identity, nation-building, globalisation, human rights, and memory. Contributors include both early-career and more established scholars. The papers represent a range of diverse perspectives. While four of them focus on tourism in Timor-Leste's post-independence era, one focuses on tourism—albeit as a vehicle for activism—during the Indonesian occupation. Reflecting the reality of Timor's Dili-centric post-independence economic development, a reality largely reflected in tourism development, three of the papers focus on tourism in Dili, while two papers focus on tourism in Atauro, a main ‘ecotourist’ destination outside of Dili. All of the papers in this special issue focus on the phenomenon of international—as opposed to domestic—tourism. Yet the authors approach international tourism from the different primary vantage points of ‘guests’ and ‘hosts’ (see Smith, 1989). Finally, the authors employ a range of methods in their analysis, including ethnography, auto-ethnography, and discourse analysis. Despite this diversity of perspectives and methods, common themes run throughout the papers—themes central to anthropological studies of tourism more generally, particularly in post-colonial and post-conflict contexts (Leite & Graburn, 2009; Salazar, 2013). These themes include tradition, authenticity, and identity; gender and labour; and human rights (and memory and history). The theme of globalisation also runs throughout the papers, as do related questions of transformation, and social and cultural change. Together, these themes contribute to a novel perspective that positions tourism as a multifaceted site of negotiation, where cultural heritage, historical memory, and social relations are continuously redefined. This approach emphasises the interplay between local agency and external pressures, highlighting how tourism serves as a platform for both resistance and adaptation in shaping national narratives and community identities. What happens when elements of ‘traditional culture’—including objects, practices, and knowledge—are marketed or sold to tourists or other foreigners? How do tourists' expectations, and, in particular, their demands for ‘authenticity’, affect the ways in which communities present their traditions or practices and to what end? What kinds of transformations take place as local communities appeal to particular international markets? Three of the five papers directly grapple with these themes. In Tusinski's ‘Cosmopolitan gastro-aesthetics and the new tastes of Timor’, the resource or product being marketed and sold to foreigners is alternately described as ‘traditional Timorese food’, ‘Timorese cuisine’, or ‘local food’ (ai haan local). Tusinki maps the process, beginning around 2011–2012, with the departure of the United Nations Integrated Mission in East Timor (UNMIT), by which Timorese foods became marked as local. Specifically, Tusinski argues that Timorese cuisine ‘emerg[ed] from friction between revitalised and objectified notions of “traditional culture” and mass-mediated global trends, tastes, and “gastro-aesthetics,” including a valorisation of food that is ‘local, zero-waste, [and] healthy’ (this issue). An end result of the presentation of an ‘authentic’ Timorese cuisine to international consumers has been the transformation of Timorese food and meanings associated with food. Tusisnki notes: ‘as existing associations and experiential qualities of food are emphasised, erased, and/or eliminated, the efficacies of food as a social substance’ are altered (this issue). Put differently, the process of constructing local food has worked ‘to unsettle foodways qualitative characteristics and their medical, moral, and cosmological meanings’ (this issue). Questions of national identity come into play here. As Tusinski points out in his paper—and as other scholars of Timor have discussed—as the Timorese people have sought to construct a national identity in the post-independence era, after 450 years of Portuguese colonisation and 24 years of Indonesian occupation, some have turned to efforts at ‘cultural revitalisation and revival’ (Barnes, 2011; Bovensiepen, 2015; McWilliam, 2005, 2011; Silva, 2013; Trindade, 2011; Tusinski, 2019). This turn to cultural revival has included the marketing of culture and its material emblems to foreign tourists (see, for example, Bravo-valenzuela e Silva, 2023; Silva et al., 2020). The construction and marketing of traditional Timorese cuisine—even as that cuisine has been heavily shaped and configured by global forces—thus fits within a larger trend in post-independence Timor-Leste, both reflecting and reinforcing the conflation of a Timorese national identity with cultural identity or traditional culture. Yet the theme of national identity is present in another way in Tusinski's paper. Tusinski argues that the marketing of local food for touristic consumption is a significant source of national pride and belonging for the younger generation of Timorese which has primarily been involved in such efforts. Tusinski explains: ‘With cultural politics dominated by resistance heroes and the Indonesian-educated “new generation”, this movement marks a youthful contribution to Timor-Leste's viability through entrepreneurialism’ (this issue). In Silva's ‘Domesticity and gender performances in the making of homestays in Atauro, Timor-Leste’, the element of traditional culture being produced, marketed, and sold is an experience as opposed to an object, although the experience is tied to a material object. Specifically, through the provision of homestays or guesthouses in the village of Usubemassu in Atauro, villagers are involved in selling the experience of living in a local ‘traditional’ house (this issue). More broadly, what is being marketed through homestays is the experience of traditional family life, or even ‘local life … as it is in fact lived by the local people who dwell there’ (this issue). Questions of authenticity are key here, as Silva explicitly notes tourists' desire to experience life in an ‘authentic home’ (this issue), and villagers likewise present their homes to tourists ‘as an absolutely authentic sample—typical of the region’ (this issue). Yet again, what is presented as authentic is a construction, as traditional homes and home life are adapted and changed to meet the real and imagined needs, desires, and expectations of foreigners, particularly those from the Global North. In terms of the houses used for homestays, Blue Ventures—the NGO working with the Timorese Government to promote ecotourism in Atauro—not only chose specific houses that already had certain elements desired by tourists such as bathrooms and rooms with doors, but then demanded further changes to the structure of these houses to make them suitable for guesthouse purposes, such as the construction and/or renovation of rooms and the acquisition of furniture and other appliances. Yet changes that have taken place to appeal to the desires and standards of tourists, changes which Silva notes can be conceived of as part of a larger ‘civilising process’, have gone beyond the physical structures of houses to involve the very organisation of the domestic space, as well as their residents' conduct within this space (this issue). These include changes in food preparation, assembly, and presentation, as well as changes in the treatment of non-human animals. Finally, in Oliviera's paper, ‘Sanan rai wisdom in Atauro's tourism transformation’, the product being marketed and sold is a form of ‘traditional art’ or ‘traditional craft’—specifically it is a form of ‘traditional pottery’ called sanan rai, which is said to have emerged over 3200 years ago. Yet again, questions of authenticity are salient here, as the craft is essentially being brought back from ‘extinction’ in the village of Arlo in Atauro for the purposes of tourism, and with a specific goal of meeting tourists' ‘desires and quality expectations’ (this issue). Questions of identity are also present in this paper. On a community level, Oliveira notes how sanan rai must be viewed not only as a commodity, but also as a symbol of ‘living memory’, which works to ‘[foster] connection and cultural continuity within the community of Arlo’ (this issue). On a national level, sanan rai has been promoted by the Timorese state as a tangible symbol of national heritage, with its preservation posed as a national imperative. With attempts to revitalise sanan rai, the craft ‘becomes a symbol of [Timorese] resilience and continuity, the past to the (this issue). and papers, further also with questions of authenticity, although in their authenticity is not to tradition or the tourism in An of foreign to the and the of at tourism to two sites of past in Timor-Leste with the Indonesian that tourists the authentic of the two sites as or sites of past this authenticity, or at this authenticity, to tourists' and of past In paper, the in Timor-Leste’, questions of authenticity in to the identity of the how international who Timorese Timor in the in to that the Indonesian on the of the The only way for these to the and Indonesian while in the was by as thus certain while in Timor to more among other they and with a certain of (this issue). a significant role in the tourism including in terms of touristic practices, as make a significant of the tourism particularly in to and craft How do navigate their within this How are including or through here is that tourism, particularly tourism, is as a of gender has been the in is most a theme in Silva's paper, ‘Domesticity and gender performances in the making of homestays in Atauro, In this paper, Silva the effects of the provision of homestays or guesthouses in the village of Usubemassu on the who in Silva argues that these homestays have to the of younger have also changed their focus from to As more in the domestic they also on outside of the end result is an in on the market Silva the that the in and in the domestic serve to gender and in the as the of domestic space to younger as they was already an established within local social As Silva points studies in other including in have & 2005). is also a theme in paper, ‘Sanan rai wisdom in Atauro's tourism transformation’, on the revival of sanan rai, or traditional in the post-independence rai has been a form of in the village of Atauro, an historical site of sanan In the post-independence efforts aim to the as a with a in Arlo involved in only in the with an aim being to out of Yet as how to these which used in to with their effects are more than only has the to the in which such have been it has also led to transformations in how the involved and are by As Oliveira notes: this process, a new has in both and (this issue). Tourism on violence, or is an of In both tourists have been as or from their with the and of & 2013). have also out the effects of such of tourism on of include the it is to or for economic involved in such tourism be through their in past tourism can to or past tourism to promote their particular of what is a contested and papers both grapple with these through their of tourism around the Indonesian period and its the other papers in this and look at tourism from the primary perspective of the The papers have different at tourism on the of the Indonesian the Indonesian and at such tourism in the post-independence Yet both papers take issue with a critical on tourism associated with both that such tourism can have impacts, both on tourists and on those to As in the in how international Timor in the by using and as this was the only way they the and by Indonesian was not the here. These of Timor's to and to with to and that the Indonesian on the of the and its (this issue). As points these by (this issue). the end result of this of was as and the while as tourists was critical in to on to the (this issue). tourism in An of foreign to the and the of post-independence tourism on the Indonesian Specifically, foreign tourists' to two main sites of past in the and the site of the and a site of and the that questions of are in the paper, that tourists these sites with the of about Timor's in they their in a of or as that tourists do their to In terms of tourists to both sites not only declared their to be but from their with an understanding of various of the Indonesian occupation, an understanding in was to for the of past Timorese on that a of tourism as or should be argues that the of Timor-Leste that tourism can play an role in attempts to more and make out of complicated of This special issue the complex and evolving role of tourism in shaping Timor-Leste's post-conflict and post-colonial identity. contributions that authenticity, gender, memory, and nation-building, the special issue how tourism its economic to a site of where local and global and cultural meanings and national to this is the dynamic between and cultural As Tusinski, Silva, and Oliveira the of Timorese through homestays, or traditional both local agency and external to meet the expectations of a global These processes of cultural adaptation and tourism's role as a platform for national pride and a medium for with global tourism (see Salazar, 2012; Salazar & Graburn, 2014). The themes of memory and as by and further tourism's to engage with tourism sites that the of the Indonesian occupation to the of tourists, these the of historical they also how tourism can and global a space for with the nation's memory. These point to the power dynamics at play within As critical contribution to the of tourism in its emphasis on understanding tourism as a site where power is actively and In the of post-conflict Timor-Leste, this perspective is particularly Tourism operates as a space where the complex power the desire to present an authentic cultural identity with the of a global In post-conflict such as Timor-Leste, where narratives of identity and are tied to processes of and nation-building, tourism becomes a tourism offers for Timor-Leste to and its as both a and a cultural the the industry local to the of cultural and historical This how tourism, from being a is in over and agency, shaping both and in a global context. are not

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Australian Journal of AnthropologySame topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207