MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405384562 · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000002537

Central Nervous System Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosed With Cauda Equina Biopsy: A Visual Vignette

2024· article· en· W4405384562 on OpenAlexaff
Béatrice Soucy, Ève Boissonnault

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalCanadian Armed ForcesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVignetteCauda equinaDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaBiopsyPathologyLymphomaCentral nervous systemRadiologyInternal medicineSpinal cord

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a case of a 44-yr-old immunocompetent man from the Ivory Coast with no significant medical history. He was admitted to the intensive care unit after presenting with neurogenic pain, diffuse weakness, decreased lower limb sensation, and urinary retention. Initial examination revealed nuchal rigidity, diffuse hypoesthesia, and against gravity asymmetric paresis, which preferentially affected the left distal upper and proximal lower limbs. He then rapidly deteriorated, with worsening weakness and an altered level of consciousness. Whole spine magnetic resonance imaging revealed multilevel leptomeningeal and spinal cord enhancement (Fig. 1), as well as severe widespread involvement of the cauda equina, nearly obliterating the subarachnoid space (Fig. 2). Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed similar abnormalities and the patient required an external ventricular drain for hydrocephalus. Imaging and clinical presentation suggested subacute lymphocytic meningitis secondary to tuberculosis or fungal infection. Neurosarcoidosis was also considered in the differential diagnosis. An empirical treatment of Decadron and an antituberculosis drug regimen was started, but the patient continued to deteriorate.FIGURE 1: Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging revealed leptomeningeal enhancement extending along the spinal cord with lesions that appear to extend into the spinal cord or minimally into the anteromedian and posteromedian fissure on axial sequences.FIGURE 2: Thoraco-lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging revealed leptomeningeal enhancement extending to the thoracic spinal cord and diffuse enhancement of all cauda equina roots affecting virtually all the subarachnoid space.Initial lumbar puncture revealed markedly increased cerebrospinal fluid protein (29.30 g/L) and cell count (740*106) (flow cytometry: 92% lymphocytes; 27% polyclonal B, 67% T cells), and very low glucose (0.3 mmol/L). There was no evidence of lymphoproliferative syndrome on repeat lumbar puncture. Cerebrospinal fluid tuberculosis PCR and mycobacterium cultures were negative. Autoimmune antibodies and extensive infectious workup serology were also negative. A nerve biopsy at the level of the cauda equina was then performed, considering the lack of improvement with empiric treatment. This led to a diagnosis of primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the central nervous system, and chemotherapy was initiated. The patient has been improving with medical treatment and rehabilitation. Aside from central nervous system lymphoma,1 two main conditions can exhibit the striking imaging findings displayed in this report, namely, tuberculosis2 and neurosarcoidosis.3 Diagnosis is challenging because of variability in disease presentation and limitations in investigations. Demonstration of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the cerebrospinal fluid is considered the ‘gold standard’ for diagnosing tuberculous meningitis.2 Neurosarcoidosis can also manifest in various ways, including medullary and cauda equina involvement, and tends to affect a younger population.3 Other cases of large B-cell lymphoma with cauda equina involvement at presentation and absence of neoplastic cells in cerebrospinal fluid flow cytometry have been reported.1 Therefore, nerve biopsy should be considered in the absence of a diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationSame topicInfectious Diseases and TuberculosisFrench-language works237,207