MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405390767 · doi:10.33002/jpg040201

Ontario Aggregate Industry and Ministry of Natural Resources Continue to Ignore or Trivialize the Notoriously Dangerous and Potentially Deadly Consequences of Flyrock from Blasting (Detonation of Explosives)

2024· article· en· W4405390767 on OpenAlex
Tony Sevelka

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Policy & Governance · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessExplosive materialStatutory lawForensic engineeringRock blastingEngineeringLawPolitical scienceGeographyMining engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aggregate extraction is one of the most noxious, toxic and destructive uses of land, and one of the uncontrollable consequences of blasting rock is flyrock, which is a health and safety risk unknown to the general public. Flyrock is the dirty little secret of the Aggregate Industry and its Explosives Engineers. They have been remarkably successful in concealing the potentially deadly consequences of flyrock from the public while continuing to engage in reckless blasting practices based on theoretical guesswork (iterative trial and error process) and inadequate permanent onsite setbacks (excavation limits) and permanent offsite separation distances. An independent analysis of a running total of 240 (known) documented flyrock incidents as of August 2024 in various jurisdictions, in which 45 of the incidents resulted in the death of 49 individuals and injury to another 49 individuals, revealed an incident “kill” rate of 18.8% (45 ÷ 240). In Ontario, anyone can engage in blasting (detonation of explosives), as there are no statutory requirements (academic or practical) to demonstrate competency, as mandated by other jurisdictions. Government advisories about the dangers and health risks of detonating explosives incorrectly, in the wrong location or under inappropriate environmental conditions are frequently issued in several jurisdictions other than in Ontario, Canada, where oversight of the aggregate industry and its explosives engineers is ineffective or non-existent. When it comes to flyrock, the only aspects of a blast in doubt are how far flyrock debris will launch from the blast site, and whether it will damage equipment, vehicles or property, or injure, permanently disable or kill human or non-human life forms. Governments bear a fundamental duty to protect their citizens’ health, safety and welfare from all the adverse effects of aggregate extraction operations, not just flyrock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it