MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405394762 · doi:10.1016/j.jciso.2024.100127

Exploring efficiency and regeneration of magnetic zeolite synthesized from coal fly ash for water treatment applications

2024· article· en· W4405394762 on OpenAlexaff
Sofi Buzukashvili, Roberto Sommerville, Ozan Kökkılıç, Philippe Ouzilleau, N.A. Rowson, Kristian E. Waters

Bibliographic record

VenueJCIS Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFly ashZeoliteRegeneration (biology)Waste managementCoalChemical engineeringOn the flyEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceChemistryEngineeringComputer scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates novel synthetic magnetic zeolites from coal fly ash (CFA) and laboratory-grade LTA zeolite enhanced with nano magnetite particles for the remediation of heavy metal ions (Pb 2+ , Cu 2+ , Zn 2+ , Ni 2+ ) from wastewater. Utilizing a continuous flow system with a laboratory scale Wet High Intensity Magnetic Separator (WHIMS), heavy metal removal and magnetic particles’ recovery from the treated solution was investigated in a process that could be appropriate to real-world systems. The adsorption performance was investigated under various operational conditions, maintaining a consistent selectivity order of Pb > Cu > Zn > Ni, repeating the selectivity order found in previous study of magnetic CFA zeolite in batch systems. Moreover, magnetic CFA zeolite was shown to be a more effective adsorbent when compared to magnetic LTA zeolite. Thus, when tested in continuous flow system under selected conditions, magnetic CFA zeolite removed 63 % Pb, 37 % Cu, 13 % Zn, and 7 % Ni while magnetic LTA zeolite removed 25 % Pb, 16 % Cu, 6 % Zn, and 3 % Ni. Furthermore, treated solution that passed through WHIMS did not contain any zeolite particles, as they were successfully captured in the metal grid. Additionally, regeneration of metal-laden magnetic zeolites through desorption experiments was investigated by enhancing the ion-exchange process using a saturated NaCl solution. The results indicated that Pb, Zn, and Ni ions were fully desorbed from magnetic zeolite, while approximately 70 % of the Cu remained to the sample. The Cu remained in the sample may be attributed to its partial adsorption onto the carbonized binder, a highly oxygenated graphenic structure, which does not readily release the adsorbed Cu ions. As these findings highlight the difference between adsorption and desorption selectivity order, further investigation into the topic would be beneficial. This research underscores the operational advantages of using magnetic LTA and CFA zeolites in industrial water treatment applications, illustrating their high adsorption capacity and straightforward desorption processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJCIS OpenSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207