MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405395152 · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae303

Effectiveness of electronic medical record-based strategies for death and hospital admission endpoint capture in pragmatic clinical trials

2024· article· en· W4405395152 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Rahafrooz, Danne C. Elbers, Junling Ren, Cenk Yildirim, Akshay S. Desai, Abigail Santos, Karen Murray, Thomas C. Havighurst, Jacob A. Udell, Michael E. Farkouh, Lawton S. Cooper, J. Michael Gaziano, Orly Vardeny, Lu Mao, KyungMann Kim, David Gagnon, Scott Solomon, Jacob Joseph

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsElectronic medical recordMedical recordClinical trialEvent (particle physics)Electronic data captureClinical endpointComputer scienceMedicineMedical emergencyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Event capture in clinical trials is resource-intensive, and electronic medical records (EMRs) offer a potential solution. This study develops algorithms for EMR-based death and hospitalization capture and compares them with traditional event capture methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the effectiveness of EMR-based event capture and site-captured events adjudicated by a clinical endpoint committee in the multi-center INfluenza Vaccine to Effectively Stop cardio Thoracic Events and Decompensated heart failure (INVESTED) trial for participants from the Veterans Affairs healthcare system. Varying time windows around event dates were used to optimize events matching. The algorithms were externally validated for heart failure hospitalizations in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. RESULTS: We observed 100% sensitivity for death events with a 1-day window. Sensitivity for cardiovascular, heart failure, pulmonary, and nonspecific cardiopulmonary hospitalizations using discharge diagnosis codes varied between 75% and 95%. Including Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data improved sensitivity with no meaningful decrease in specificity. The MIMIC-IV analysis showed 82% sensitivity and 99% specificity for heart failure hospitalizations. DISCUSSION: EMR-based method accurately identifies all-cause mortality and demonstrates high accuracy for cardiopulmonary hospitalizations. This study underscores the importance of optimal time windows, data completeness, and domain variability in EMR systems. CONCLUSION: EMR-based methods are effective strategies for capturing death and hospitalizations in clinical trials; however, their effectiveness may be influenced by the complexity of events and domain variability across different EMR systems. Nonetheless, EMR-based methods can serve as a valuable complement to traditional methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.591
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.754
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.504

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5910.754
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.007
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0040.006
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Medical Informatics AssociationSame topicMachine Learning in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207