MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405395618 · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2024.109213

Effects of diesel exhaust inhalation on cognitive performance in human volunteers: A randomized controlled crossover study

2024· article· en· W4405395618 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jason Curran, A. J. Hirsch Allen, Christopher F. Rider, Robin Shutt, Chris Carlsten

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment International · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia HospitalHealth CanadaBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsCrossover studyDiesel exhaustInhalationRandomized controlled trialCrossoverMedicineCognitionAnesthesiaDiesel fuelAutomotive engineeringPsychologyEngineeringSurgeryComputer sciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Substantial evidence exists linking traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) to impairment in cognitive functioning. • We did first doubleblind crossover trial to investigate the effects of controlled TRAP on cognitive performance in humans. • Short-term exposure to diesel exhaust (DE) was associated with slower reaction times in the Reaction Time Index task. • DE exposure slowed reaction times similarly to those previously demonstrated with blood alcohol levels of 0.05%. • Implications exist for workers in occupations where attention and reaction time are connected to safety and performance. Mounting evidence links exposure to traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) to impairment in cognitive functioning. To determine if short-term, controlled exposure to diesel exhaust (DE) adversely affects one or more cognitive function domains. We carried out a double-blinded crossover design with 28 healthy, adult volunteers. Volunteers were exposed to two conditions for 120 min each, on separate order-randomized occasions: filtered air (FA) and DE (300 µg/m 3 PM 2.5 ) at the Air Pollution Exposure Laboratory (APEL) at Vancouver General Hospital (VGH). Volunteers were blinded to the two exposure conditions. Volunteers completed five computerised neuropsychological tests of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) prior to (2-hr before) and at three timepoints following each exposure condition (0-hr, 3-h post-, and 24-h post-exposure). The selected CANTAB tests were related to five cognitive domains – attention, spatial working memory, strategy use, executive function, and processing speed. We hypothesized that short-term diesel exposure would adversely affect one or more cognitive function domains. Following screening, 15 volunteers were randomized to receive FA followed by DE and 14 volunteers were randomized to receive the exposures in the reverse sequence. A total of 28 volunteers contributed to the final analysis. Short-term exposure to DE was associated with slower reaction times in the Reaction Time Index task. DE was associated with a decrease of 18.2 ms (p = 0.05) in simple reaction time and 23.5 ms (p = 0.04) in five-choice reaction time. This first study to investigate the effects of TRAP on the cognitive performance of humans in a controlled environment shows slowed reaction times similar to those previously demonstrated with blood alcohol levels of 0.05%. Important implications exist for workers in occupations where attention and reaction time are connected to safety and performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironment InternationalSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207