Breeding <i>Ammospiza nelsoni</i> (Nelson’s Sparrow) exploits both saltmarsh and hayfields in northern habitats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Ammospiza nelsoni subvirgata (Acadian subspecies of Nelson’s Sparrow) breeds in saltmarsh from northern Massachusetts to New Brunswick and eastern Quebec. In the Canadian Maritimes, this subspecies also successfully breeds in diked agricultural lands (i.e., “dikeland”) that were originally created by Acadian settlers in the 1600s. Little is known about the reasons for or consequences of using dikeland for breeding. To fill this knowledge gap, we tracked male and female sparrows, and monitored nest fates in natural saltmarsh and human-made dikeland habitats. We collected fecal samples from adults and nestlings to examine which habitat type they were foraging in, and we also quantified vegetative cover. We hypothesized that flood risk in saltmarsh played an important role in the decision of A. n. subvirgata to nest in dikeland given that the saltmarsh is regularly inundated with tidal water. Based on nest monitoring, we estimated higher overall nest success in dikeland than saltmarsh. Fecal sample analysis showed distinct differences in diet between individuals using dikeland compared with saltmarsh. We also observed differences in vegetation. These results suggest that A. n. subvirgata are able to take advantage of readily available human-made habitats for breeding. With rising sea levels and increased storm events threatening coastal habitats, it is important to understand whether coastal-breeding birds can adapt to changes and what trade-offs exist for individuals who shift to alternative habitats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".