MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405398440 · doi:10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100562

Socioeconomic/health-related factors associated with HPV vaccination initiation/completion among females of paediatric age: A systematic review with meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4405398440 on OpenAlexafffund
George N. Okoli, Alexandra Grossman Moon, Alexandra E Soos, Christine Neilson, Hannah J. Kimmel, Katharine Etsell, Avneet Grewal, Paul Van Caeseele, Caroline R. Richardson, Diane M. Harper

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic Health in Practice · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusMeta-analysisMedicineDemographySystematic reviewVaccinationEnvironmental healthMEDLINEBiologyPopulationImmunologySociologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To systematically identify, appraise, and summarise published evidence on individual socioeconomic and health-related factors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination initiation and completion among females of paediatric age. Study design: A global systematic review with meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42023445721). Methods: We performed a literature search in December 2022 and supplemented the search on August 1, 2023. Appropriate data were pooled using an inverse variance, random-effects model and the results were expressed as odds ratios, with 95 % confidence intervals. A statistically significant point pooled increased/decreased odds of 30-69 % was regarded to be strongly associated, and ≥70 % was very strongly associated. Results: We included 83 cross-sectional studies. Among several significantly associated factors, being an older girl: 1.67 (1.44-1.93), having health insurance: 1.41 (1.16-1.72), and being in a public school: 1.54 (1.05-2.26) strongly increased the odds of vaccination initiation, and nativity in the country of study: 1.82 (1.33-2.50), use of contraception: 2.00 (1.16-3.46), receipt of influenza vaccination: 1.75 (1.54-2.00) and having visited a healthcare provider: 1.85 (1.51-2.28) in the preceding year very strongly increased the odds of vaccination initiation. Likewise, being an older girl: 1.36 (1.23-1.49) and having visited a healthcare provider in the preceding year: 1.46 (1.05-2.04) strongly increased the odds of vaccination series completion, and school-based vaccination: 3.08 (1.05-9.07), having health insurance: 1.72 (1.27-2.33), and receipt of influenza vaccination in the preceding year: 1.72 (1.62-1.83) very strongly increased the odds of vaccination series completion. We made similar observations when the studies were limited to the United States. Conclusions: Several individual socioeconomic/health-related factors may determine initiating and completing the HPV vaccination series among paediatric females. These factors provide insights that may be key to identifying girls at increased risk of not being vaccinated and may aid targeted public health messaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.357
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublic Health in PracticeSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207