MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405420218 · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.002

Association between adverse birth outcomes and long-term risk of premature cardiovascular disease and mortality in a contemporary population-based cohort of 502,383 pregnant women

2024· article· en· W4405420218 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Padma Kaul, Olesya Barrett, Anamaria Savu, Vichy Liyanage, Sandra T. Davidge, Christy‐Lynn M. Cooke

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Heart Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsCanadian VIGOUR CentreAlberta Health ServicesAlberta HealthWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Health Services
KeywordsMedicineCohortCohort studyPremature birthDiseasePopulationObstetricsPediatricsPregnancyPerinatal mortalityDemographyGestational ageEnvironmental healthFetusInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Relatively few studies have examined the association between the entire spectrum of adverse birth outcomes [stillbirth, preterm birth (PTB), term births that are low birth weight (LBW) or high birth weight (HBW)] and long-term risk of CVD in the mother. Our objective was to examine the association between birth outcomes and risk of premature CVD or death in a contemporary cohort of pregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study of women in Alberta, Canada, between 01/01/2005 and 01/01/2023. The primary endpoint was a composite of CVD-related hospitalization, CVD-related emergency department visit, or death. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to examine the independent association between birth outcomes and the risk of CVD or death in the mother, after accounting for other socio-demographic, clinical and pregnancy-related complications. RESULTS: Among 502,383 mothers, 0.51% had stillbirth, 7.11% had PTB, 86.11% had normal birth weight (NBW), 2.11% had LBW, and 4.15% had HBW. During a median follow-up of 3612 days (∼10 years), compared the NBW group, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for maternal CVD or death associated with stillbirth was 1.63 (1.33, 1.99); 1.45 (1.36, 1.55) for PTB; 1.22 (1.06, 1.41) for LBW, and 1.13 (1.03, 1.23) for HBW. In addition to birth outcomes, pre-existing diabetes (aHR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.47, 1.76), gestational hypertension (aHR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.38, 1.57), and pre-existing hypertension (aHR: 3.28, 95% CI: 2.66, 4.04) carried a higher risk for premature CVD and death in the mother. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse birth outcomes of stillbirth and preterm birth, and to a lesser degree term births that result in LBW or HBW, are markers of increased risk of premature CVD and death in the mother. Coordinated effort between obstetricians, family physicians, and cardiologists are needed to design and implement effective risk reduction programs tailored for these high-risk women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Heart JournalSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207