MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405421847 · doi:10.1177/11769351241307163

Utilizing an In-silico Approach to Pinpoint Potential Biomarkers for Enhanced Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer

2024· article· en· W4405421847 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Informatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersHamedan University of Medical SciencesHamadan University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsmicroRNAColorectal cancerIn silicoLogistic regressionComputational biologyGeneDiseaseBioinformaticsCancerBiologyMedicineInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent disease characterized by significant dysregulation of gene expression. Non-invasive tests that utilize microRNAs (miRNAs) have shown promise for early CRC detection. This study aims to determine the association between miRNAs and key genes in CRC. Methods: Two datasets (GSE106817 and GSE23878) were extracted from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database. Penalized logistic regression (PLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN) were used to identify relevant miRNAs and evaluate the classification accuracy of the selected miRNAs. The findings were validated through bipartite miRNA-mRNA interactions. Results: Our analysis identified 3 miRNAs: miR-1228, miR-6765-5p, and miR-6787-5p, achieving a total accuracy of over 90%. Based on the results of the mRNA-miRNA interaction network, CDK1 and MAD2L1 were identified as target genes of miR-6787-5p. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the identified miRNAs and target genes could serve as non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosing colorectal cancer, pending laboratory confirmation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it