Effect of a Web-Based Heartfulness Program on the Mental Well-Being, Biomarkers, and Gene Expression Profile of Health Care Students: Randomized Controlled Trial
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health care students often experience high levels of stress, anxiety, and mental health issues, making it crucial to address these challenges. Variations in stress levels may be associated with changes in dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels and gene expression. Meditative practices have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing stress and improving mental well-being. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the effects of Heartfulness meditation on mental well-being, DHEA-S, IL-6, and gene expression profile. METHODS: The 78 enrolled participants were randomly assigned to the Heartfulness meditation (n=42, 54%) and control (n=36, 46%) groups. The participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) at baseline and after week 12. Gene expression with messenger RNA sequencing and DHEA-S and IL-6 levels were also measured at baseline and the completion of the 12 weeks. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, paired t test, and 1-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The Heartfulness group exhibited a significant 17.35% reduction in PSS score (from mean 19.71, SD 5.09 to mean 16.29, SD 4.83; P<.001) compared to a nonsignificant 6% reduction in the control group (P=.31). DASS-21 scores decreased significantly by 27.14% in the Heartfulness group (from mean 21.15, SD 9.56 to mean 15.41, SD 7.87; P<.001) while it increased nonsignificantly by 17% in the control group (P=.04). For the DASS-21 subcomponents-the Heartfulness group showed a statistically significant 28.53% reduction in anxiety (P=.006) and 27.38% reduction in stress (P=.002) versus an insignificant 22% increase in anxiety (P=.02) and 6% increase in stress (P=.47) in the control group. Further, DHEA-S levels showed a significant 20.27% increase in the Heartfulness group (from mean 251.71, SD 80.98 to mean 302.74, SD 123.56; P=.002) compared to an insignificant 9% increase in the control group (from mean 285.33, SD 112.14 to mean 309.90, SD 136.90; P=.10). IL-6 levels showed a statistically significant difference in both the groups (from mean 4.93, SD 1.35 to mean 3.67, SD 1.0; 28.6%; P<.001 [Heartfulness group] and from mean 4.52, SD 1.40 to mean 2.72, SD 1.74; 40%; P<.001 [control group]). Notably, group comparison at 12 weeks revealed a significant difference in perceived stress, DASS-21 and its subcomponents, and IL-6 (all P<.05/4). The gene expression profile with messenger RNA sequencing identified 875 upregulated genes and 1539 downregulated genes in the Heartfulness group compared to baseline, and there were 292 upregulated genes and 1180 downregulated genes in the Heartfulness group compared to the control group after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Heartfulness practice was associated with decreased depression, anxiety, and stress scores and improved health measures in DHEA-S and IL-6 levels. The gene expression data point toward possible mechanisms of alleviation of symptoms of stress, anxiety and depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN82860715; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN82860715.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it