MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405430104 · doi:10.1016/j.anai.2024.12.008

Clinical burden, treatment, and disease control in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria

2024· article· en· W4405430104 on OpenAlexaff
Marc A. Riedl, Dhaval Patil, Jonathan Rodrigues, Merin Kuruvilla, Tara Raftery, Irina Pivneva, Jason Doran, Arthur Voegel, James Signorovitch, Gil Yosipovitch

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrticaria and Related Conditions
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
FundersGrifolsNovartis Animal HealthBioCrystCelldex TherapeuticsIonis PharmaceuticalsEli Lilly and CompanyCSL BehringSanofiKiniksa PharmaceuticalsPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationRegeneron PharmaceuticalsNovartis PharmaNovartis
KeywordsMedicineChronic urticariaReal world evidenceIntensive care medicineDiseaseChronic diseaseDermatologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an unpredictable inflammatory skin condition with substantial clinical burden that affects 0.23% to 0.78% of the US population. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and prevalence of patients with a record of CSU diagnosis, treatment patterns, disease control, and clinical and economic burden in a US cohort of patients with CSU. METHODS: Adults with a record of CSU diagnosis within the US HealthVerity claims database were eligible. Age- and gender-adjusted prevalence/incidence rates were calculated for January 2017 to December 2022. Clinical characteristics were described during the 1 year before CSU diagnosis (baseline) and the time after (follow-up). Proxy events representing uncontrolled CSU (any record of prescriptions for corticosteroids, biologics, or immunosuppressants [excluding all antihistamines and over-the-counter medication] or any CSU-related inpatient admissions or emergency department or urgent care visits) were used to identify patients with uncontrolled CSU. Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and health care costs were described. RESULTS: Overall, 200,298 patients were followed-up for a median of 2.3 years after diagnosis. Estimated cumulative prevalence of diagnosed CSU was 0.57% (women: 0.80%; men: 0.32%). The average annual incidence rate was 0.08%. Corticosteroids were the most prescribed treatment during follow-up among the 166,195 patients prescribed at least 1 treatment (94.3%). Proxy events were observed in 59.1% of the patients. HCRU and health care costs increased from baseline in patients with uncontrolled CSU during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Of patients with CSU who were prescribed treatment, more than 50% experienced uncontrolled CSU, which was associated with increased HCRU and health care costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Allergy Asthma & ImmunologySame topicUrticaria and Related ConditionsFrench-language works237,207