Generalization of Interarticulator Timing Control: Evidence From Tongue–Jaw and Lip–Jaw Kinematics Using Electromagnetic Articulography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In skilled speech production, the motor system coordinates the movements of distinct sets of articulators to form precise and consistent constrictions in the vocal tract at distinct locations, across contextual variations in movement rate and amplitude. Research efforts have sought to uncover the critical control parameters governing interarticulator coordination during constriction formation, with a focus on two parameters: (a) latency of movement onset of one articulator relative to another (temporal parameters) and (b) phase angle of movement onset for one articulator relative to another (spatiotemporal parameters). Consistent interarticulator timing between jaw and tongue tip movements, during the formation of constrictions at the alveolar ridge, was previously found to scale more reliably than phase angles across variation in production rate and syllable stress. In the present study, we test whether these temporal regularities generalize to another set of articulators, namely, the jaw and lower lip, during the formation of constrictions at the lips. METHOD: Eight talkers produced vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) sequences, recorded using electromagnetic articulography, with variation in production rate and syllable stress. V was /ɑ/-/ɛ/ and C was alveolar /t/-/d/ or bilabial /p/-/b/. Two measures were obtained: (a) the timing of tongue tip/lower lip raising onset for intervocalic C, relative to jaw opening-closing cycles for the flanking vowels, and (b) the angle of tongue tip/lower lip raising onset for intervocalic C, relative to the jaw phase plane. RESULTS: Across both sets of articulators, consonant-related movement onset latencies scaled more consistently with variation in the jaw opening-closing cycle than phase angles. Furthermore, movement onset latencies were more strongly affiliated with utterance type than phase angles. CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate that precise temporal coordination of articulator movements regulates the formation of precise constrictions, independent of the specific set of articulators involved or where in the vocal tract the constriction is produced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".