MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405436044 · doi:10.25071/2291-5796.167

Listening to voices that are challenging to hear: participatory hermeneutics ethnography with children with medical complexity

2024· article· en· W4405436044 on OpenAlex
Raíssa Passos dos Santos, Mary Ellen Macdonald, Eliane Tatsch Neves, Franco A. Carnevale

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueWitness The Canadian Journal of Critical Nursing Discourse · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDalhousie UniversityUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActive listeningCitizen journalismAgency (philosophy)Inclusion (mineral)Participatory action researchParticipant observationHermeneuticsStorytellingEthnographyPsychologySociologySocial psychologySocial scienceEpistemologyComputer sciencePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This manuscript explores the integration of participatory hermeneutic ethnography in research with children with complexity, particularly those who communicate differently. Traditional research methods often exclude these children, leading to a lack of representation of their unique experiences. The study employs a participatory approach that emphasizes ethical considerations, relational perspectives, and the inclusion of non-verbal communication methods to better capture the voices of these children. The research involved eight children with medical complexity, along with their families and healthcare professionals, providing a comprehensive understanding of their lived experiences. Data collection was conducted over seven months using methods such as participant observation, informal and structured interviews, and innovative techniques like drawing, storytelling, and play-based activities. The study highlighted the importance of respecting each child’s unique communication style and ensuring their active participation in the research process. The findings reveal that traditional biomedical approaches often overlook the complex social and moral realities of children’s experiences. By employing a hermeneutic framework, the research provided deeper insights into the children’s expressions, both verbal and non-verbal, within their broader social contexts. This approach also underscored the significance of understanding children’s voices through the lens of their relational and social environments. The study underscores the necessity of inclusive and participatory research methodologies for effectively capturing the varied experiences of children with medical complexity. It calls for a shift away from normalized expectations of verbal communication and emphasizes the need for continued development of methods that respect and validate the agency of all children, regardless of their communication abilities. The implications of this research extend to both academic inquiry and clinical practice, advocating for more ethically attuned and inclusive approaches in working with children who communicate differently. Future research should build on these findings, exploring innovative strategies to further empower these children and enhance our understanding of their experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it