MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405436745 · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2024.110211

Genetic variants in PIKFYVE: A review of ocular phenotypes

2024· review· en· W4405436745 on OpenAlexafffund
Ehsan Misaghi, Pekka Kannus, Ian M. MacDonald, Matthew D. Benson

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Eye Research · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFoundation Fighting Blindness
KeywordsPhenotypeGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many studies have identified disease-causing variants of PIKFYVE in ocular tissues; however, a comprehensive review of these variants and their ocular phenotypes is lacking. The phosphoinositide kinase PIKFYVE plays crucial roles in the endolysosomal pathway in autophagy and phagocytosis, both essential for cellular homeostasis. In this review, we evaluate the reported disease-causing PIKFYVE variants and their associated phenotypes in humans to identify potential genotype-phenotype correlations. Variants in PIKFYVE have been associated with corneal fleck dystrophy, congenital cataracts and possibly keratoconus. There are unvalidated associations of variants in PIKFYVE with autism spectrum disorder and congenital heart disease. We show that variants causing corneal fleck dystrophy exist in the chaperonin-like domain of PIKFYVE as well as the region between the chaperonin-like and the kinase domains. Similarly, congenital cataract variants appear to be specific to the kinase domain of the protein. This review consolidates existing knowledge on PIKFYVE variants in ocular disease and bridges fundamental science and clinical manifestations, potentially informing future diagnostic and treatment strategies for PIKFYVE-associated ocular disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental Eye ResearchSame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207