MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405438329 · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ad9f66

Development of a low-dose strategy for propagation-based imaging helical computed tomography (PBI-HCT): high image quality and reduced radiation dose

2024· article· en· W4405438329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Physics & Engineering Express · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMRI in cancer diagnosis
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Light Source
KeywordsComputed tomographyImage qualityRadiation doseNuclear medicineHelical computed tomographyQuality (philosophy)Biomedical engineeringMedicineMedical physicsMaterials scienceRadiologyComputer scienceImage (mathematics)PhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background . Propagation-based imaging computed tomography (PBI-CT) has been recently emerging for visualizing low-density materials due to its excellent image contrast and high resolution. Based on this, PBI-CT with a helical acquisition mode (PBI-HCT) offers superior imaging quality (e.g., fewer ring artifacts) and dose uniformity, making it ideal for biomedical imaging applications. However, the excessive radiation dose associated with high-resolution PBI-HCT may potentially harm objects or hosts being imaged, especially in live animal imaging, raising a great need to reduce radiation dose. Methods . In this study, we strategically integrated Sparse2Noise (a deep learning approach) with PBI-HCT imaging to reduce radiation dose without compromising image quality. Sparse2Noise uses paired low-dose noisy images with different photon fluxes and projection numbers for high-quality reconstruction via a convolutional neural network (CNN). Then, we examined the imaging quality and radiation dose of PBI-HCT imaging using Sparse2Noise, as compared to when Sparse2Noise was used in low-dose PBI-CT imaging (circular scanning mode). Furthermore, we conducted a comparison study on the use of Sparse2Noise versus two other state-of-the-art low-dose imaging algorithms (i.e., Noise2Noise and Noise2Inverse) for imaging low-density materials using PBI-HCT at equivalent dose levels. Results . Sparse2Noise allowed for a 90% dose reduction in PBI-HCT imaging while maintaining high image quality. As compared to PBI-CT imaging, the use of Sparse2Noise in PBI-HCT imaging shows more effective by reducing additional radiation dose (30%–36%). Furthermore, helical scanning mode also enhances the performance of existing low-dose algorithms (Noise2Noise and Noise2Inverse); nevertheless, Sparse2Noise shows significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) value compared to Noise2Noise and Noise2Inverse at the same radiation dose level. Conclusions and significance . Our proposed low-dose imaging strategy Sparse2Noise can be effectively applied to PBI-HCT imaging technique and requires lower dose for acceptable quality imaging. This would represent a significant advance imaging for low-density materials imaging and for future live animals imaging applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it