MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405453997 · doi:10.14195/2182-7982_41_9

Um forno e dois crânios encontrados na porta Sul da Egitânia (Idanha-a-Velha): uma descoberta única do início da Idade Média

2024· article· pt· W4405453997 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sofia Tereso, Carla Ribeiro, José Manuel Cristóvão, Tomás Cordero Ruíz, Ricardo Costeira da Silva, Catarina Tente, Pedro C. Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueAntropologia Portuguesa · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaFederation for the Humanities and Social Sciences
KeywordsHumanitiesHistoryGeologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Em 2019, durante as escavações arqueológicas levadas a cabo na Aldeia Histórica de Idanha-a-Velha, no âmbito do projeto “IGAEDIS: Da Civitas Igaeditanorum à Egitânia. A construção e evolução da cidade e a definição dos seus territórios da época romana até à doação dos Templários (séculos I a XII)”, foram exumados dois crânios no interior de um pequeno forno localizado na porta sul da antiga cidade romana. Os crânios correspondem a dois indivíduos com idades compreendidas entre os 7 e os 16 anos e foram datados da fase final da época romana. Os mesmos foram depositados no forno em posição secundária após o abandono deste, num momento que terá ocorrido com maior probabilidade já no século VI. Este depósito, que constitui um contexto original e único no mundo funerário da Alta Idade Média lusitana e peninsular, levanta várias questões de interpretação e de leitura de sequências temporais na formação de contextos arqueológicos complexos. Os dois indivíduos foram analisados e apresenta-se igualmente os resultados desse estudo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntropologia PortuguesaSame topicArchaeological and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207