MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405461864 · doi:10.3390/children11121529

Comparing Management Strategies for Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score of 4 (TLICS = 4) in the Pediatric Population: A Single-Institutional Experience

2024· article· en· W4405461864 on OpenAlexaff
Jose Castillo, Michael Le, Khadija Soufi, James Zhou, Edwin Kulubya, Anzhela D. Moskalik, Yashar Javidan, Julius O. Ebinu

Bibliographic record

VenueChildren · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryDeformityRetrospective cohort studyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar (TL) fractures are uncommon injuries in the pediatric population. Surgery is recommended for TL fractures with significant deformity, posterior ligamentous complex disruption, or neurological compromise. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale (TLICS) has been validated in pediatric populations and serves as a valuable tool for guiding treatment decisions. However, there remains a lack of clarity regarding the appropriate treatment for patients with a TLICS of 4. While conservative and surgical techniques have been described, most studies focused on adult populations, and there is no consensus on the appropriate management in the pediatric population. We reviewed our institutional experience of TL fractures in young children with TLICS of 4, managed both non-operatively and operatively. METHODS: A retrospective review of a single institution's experience managing pediatric patients (<18 years old) with TL fractures receiving a TLICS of 4 from 2015 to 2023 was conducted to determine the clinical outcomes following non-operative and operative treatment. RESULTS: Among 11 pediatric patients, 4 were managed with bracing alone, primarily for posterior column fractures, using a thoracolumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO). Four patients underwent minimally invasive screw fixation (MISF), for Chance or posterior column fractures, with an average operative time of 143 min, blood loss of 29 cc, length of stay (LOS) of 9.8 days, and a follow-up interval of 6 months. Three patients received open posterior screw fixation (OPSF), most commonly for Chance fractures, with averages of 129 min operative time, 225 cc blood loss, 9.7 days LOS, and 4 months follow-up. Both MISF and OPSF utilized intra-operative imaging, with lower radiation exposure in the MISF group. One MISF patients had hardware failure evident by screw lucency on follow-up imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Bracing and surgery are safe management options for pediatric TL fractures receiving a TLICS of 4. MISF is an effective alternative treatment strategy, comparable to OPSF, with the advantage of reduced blood loss and radiation exposure. Further studies with age-matched cohorts and long-term outcomes may help determine the optimal management course.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChildrenSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207