Unsettling Black, Indigenous and Queer Latinx Senses of Place and Radically Remapping Latinx Geographies of Belonging in the City
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the radical possibilities of Latinx senses of place and geographies. I do this by deeply engaging with the film series, Will You Listen? by Kichwa artist Samay Arcentales Cajas, which explores Latinx people’s experiences and relationships to place in Tkaronto (Toronto, Canada). Weaving an intersectional, interdisciplinary, and geographic framework and methodology, I demonstrate how Black/Afro-Latina, Indigenous, and racialized queer and nonbinary Latinx people featured voice distinct unsettling Latinx senses of place. I offer unsettling Latinx senses of place as a concept that speaks to how Latinx people understand, navigate, and make place through an embodied anticolonial feminist praxis, which challenges how intersecting relations of conquest and power shape their everyday lives and the spaces they inhabit. Unsettling Latinx senses of place engender refusals of normative claims to space and belonging in relation to the city, the nation-state, and hegemonic Latinidad, while also illustrating new ways of belonging grounded in relationships of care, reciprocity, and solidarity. Overall, I aim to enrich understandings of Latinx senses of place and contribute to the growing field of Latinx geographies in a way that works toward more just and liberatory geographies within and beyond the discipline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".