Entirely Exophytic HPV-associated Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: A Rare But Potentially Aggressive Neoplastic Phenomenon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A subset of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma (EA) displays exclusively exophytic growth, with or without a classic villoglandular appearance. Given that increased depth and extent of destructive stromal invasion are associated with poorer prognosis for HPV-associated EA, it is believed that exclusively exophytic tumors are associated with a relatively indolent clinical course. There is, however, a paucity of data regarding the behavior of these neoplasms. We assembled a cohort of 73 patients with entirely resected cervix-confined HPV-associated EA treated with primary operative therapy. The tumors were classified based on architecture and presence/extent of stromal invasion, and histopathologic parameters, including the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 substage and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Clinical outcomes including local recurrence, metastasis, and death were evaluated. Of 73 tumors, 4 (6%) demonstrated exclusively exophytic growth (0.4-2.2 cm in maximal dimension). All lacked LVI as well as nodal involvement. None of the 4 patients with exclusively exophytic tumors received adjuvant therapy. Two of the 4 (50%), however, experienced recurrence and both patients eventually died of causes related to EA. Of the remaining 69 cases with a component of nonexophytic growth, <6% of patients experienced tumor recurrence. Our study has found that, in at least a subset of cases, exclusively exophytic HPV-associated EA is associated with adverse outcomes. Additional studies are needed to substantiate these findings and to identify additional features (pathologic, molecular, etc.) that may aid in identifying those patients who could benefit from more aggressive treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".