MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405472787 · doi:10.1353/ink.00013

Unraveling Time: Reading Temporal Shifts as Intergenerational Narrative Weaving in Wanda John-Kehewin’s Visions of the Crow

2024· article· en· W4405472787 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beyond Collective Andrea Hoff, Wanda John-Kehewin

Bibliographic record

VenueInks · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisionWeavingNarrativeReading (process)ArtClose readingSociologyVisual artsLiteratureLinguisticsPhilosophyAnthropologyBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Wanda John-Kehewin’s Visions of the Crow ( Dreams Trilogy: Volume One ) centers on protagonist Daemon Quinn, a Cree teenager facing challenges at home and school. As the narrative interweaves different temporalities, Daemon’s quest to overcome his present-day challenges and comprehend his ancestral identity illuminates the direct correlations between the effects of colonialism and his contemporary struggles. This paper functions as a conversation. It is interspersed with visual and narrative analysis of page layouts as we explore the distinctive capabilities of comics to weave temporal elements within Indigenous-centered storytelling, supporting a critical and expanded reading of the text. By situating the discussion and analysis in moments of temporal shifts, we investigate how Visions of the Crow facilitates the intertwining of timescales and broader narrative devices within its structure. Through this process, we aim to illustrate how comics are particularly well-suited to examining the enduring legacy of intergenerational trauma and offer the potential for intergenerational healing. Aligning with Wanda John-Kehewin’s intentions as the author of Visions of the Crow —to critically reflect on Canada’s history with Indigenous Peoples and to demonstrate that Indigenous Peoples can address social issues and history in a way that fosters critical thinking and growth—this paper also examines the profound and lasting impact of colonialism on Indigenous communities and family systems. Through our discussion, we aim to acknowledge how the past continues to shape the present while exploring spaces of hope and healing for the future within the storytelling of comics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.154

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.020
Scholarly communication0.0100.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInksSame topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207