MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405481225 · doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1502151

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

2024· review· en· W4405481225 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ziteng Wang, Jiali Huang, Quan Li, Jing Wang, Hui Su, Chunmei Guo, Hongfang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Nutrition · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmall intestinal bacterial overgrowthMedicineFatty liverDiseaseLiver diseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyIrritable bowel syndrome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), characterized by alterations in both the type and quantity of bacteria in the small intestine, leads to impaired intestinal digestion and absorption that can cause a range of clinical symptoms. Recent studies have identified significant changes in the composition of the small intestinal microbiota and metabolomic profiles of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). This study systematically reviewed and synthesized the available data to explore the association between SIBO and MASLD. Comprehensive literature searches of the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane databases were conducted. Article quality screening was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Cross-sectional, cohort, and case–control studies were included. A total of 7,200 articles were initially screened, of which 14 were ultimately included for analysis. Individuals with SIBO in both the MASLD and non-MASLD groups were extracted and a chi-square test was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The I 2 index was used to measure heterogeneity. For heterogeneity >50%, a random effects model was used. There was a clear association between SIBO and MASLD (OR = 3.09; 95% CI 2.09–4.59, I 2 = 66%, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses by MASLD stage showed that the probability of SIBO positivity increased with MASLD lesion severity. After stratifying by the diagnostic methods for SIBO and MASLD, the meta-analysis results suggest a reduction in inter-group heterogeneity. For the MASLD subgroup diagnosed via liver biopsy, the OR was 4.89. A subgroup analysis of four studies that included intestinal permeability testing revealed an OR of 3.86 (95% CI: 1.80–8.28, I 2 = 9%, p = 0.0005). A meta-regression analyses revealed that both race and regional development level significantly influenced the relationship between SIBO and MASLD ( p = 0.010, p = 0.047). In conclusion, this meta-analyses provides strong evidence that SIBO may contribute to the development and progression of MASLD. The strongest associations were observed between lactulose breath testing, gut microbiota culture, liver biopsy diagnosis of MASLD, and SIBO detected through intestinal permeability testing. The primary sources of heterogeneity are race and developed regions. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=427040 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NutritionSame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207