MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405481269 · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1468957

Hidden features: CD36/SR-B2, a master regulator of macrophage phenotype/function through metabolism

2024· review· en· W4405481269 on OpenAlexaff
Yuge Chen, Xuejia Zhang, Shengbin Huang, Maria Febbraio

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Immunology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune cells in cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD36PhenotypeBiologyMacrophageTranscriptomeCell biologyLipid metabolismScavenger receptorFunction (biology)Gene expressionReceptorGeneticsGeneBiochemistryIn vitroCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Once thought to be in a terminally differentiated state, macrophages are now understood to be highly pliable, attuned and receptive to environmental cues that control and align responses. In development of purpose, the centrality of metabolic pathways has emerged. Thus, macrophage inflammatory or reparative phenotypes are tightly linked to catabolic and anabolic metabolism, with further fine tuning of specific gene expression patterns in specific settings. Single-cell transcriptome analyses have revealed a breadth of macrophage signatures, with some new influencers driving phenotype. CD36/Scavenger Receptor B2 has established roles in immunity and lipid metabolism. Macrophage CD36 is a key functional player in metabolic expression profiles that determine phenotype. Emerging data show that alterations in the microenvironment can recast metabolic pathways and modulate macrophage function, with the potential to be leveraged for therapeutic means. This review covers recent data on phenotypic characterization of homeostatic, atherosclerotic, lipid-, tumor- and metastatic-associated macrophages, with the integral role of CD36 highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in ImmunologySame topicImmune cells in cancerFrench-language works237,207