MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405483743 · doi:10.2172/2481303

DECOVALEX-2023: Task C Final Report

2024· report· en· W4405483743 on OpenAlexafffund
Bastian Graupner, Kate Thatcher, Rebecca Newson, Merle Bjorge, Wolfram Rühaak, Hua Shao, Jan Thiedau, Michael Pitz, Peng‐Zhi Pan, Wenbo Hou, Larissa Friedenberg, Tae‐Hyun Kim, Changsoo Lee, Chan–Hee Park, J. Rutqvist, Ruiping Guo, Teklu Hadgu, Edward Matteo, Thomas Dewers, Aqeel Afzal Chaudhry, Dmitri Naumov, Sonja Kaiser, Thomas Nagel, Jörg Buchwald, Wenqing Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsNuclear Waste Management Organization
FundersEidgenössisches NuklearsicherheitsinspektoratKorea Atomic Energy Research InstituteJapan Atomic Energy AgencyNuclear Waste Management OrganizationCanadian Nuclear Safety CommissionU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsTask (project management)Environmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Task F: Performance Assessment -Comparative generic performance assessment models in crystalline and salt formations • Task G: SAFENET -Laboratory-scale TH and THM analyses of single fractures The DECOVALEX Project would not have been possible without the support and engagement of the participating organizations who jointly support the coordination of the project within a given project phase, propose and coordinate modeling tasks, including the necessary experimental data, and deploy their research team (or teams) working on a selection of the tasks conducted in the project.The partner organizations in DECOVALEX-2023 were:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207