MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Diagnosis of schizophrenia using an extended multivariate autoregressive model for EEGs

2024· article· en· W4405491457 on OpenAlexaff
A.R. Torabi, J.P. Reilly, Duncan J. MacCrimmon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoregressive modelMultivariate statisticsSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Computer scienceSTAR modelArtificial intelligenceStatisticsEconometricsMachine learningAutoregressive integrated moving averageMathematicsTime series

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schizophrenia is a complex brain disorder that leads to an abnormal interpretation of reality. One of its reliable biological markers is the auditory evoked potential P300. The aim of the current paper is to classify healthy-control subjects from schizophrenic patients using EEG signals collected during an auditory oddball paradigm. The electroencephalogram (EEG) is modeled by a multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) model that takes into account the instantaneous causality between the EEG channels. After preprocessing, 19 channels of the recorded signals were divided into seven clusters based on their location. Next, the PCA technique was employed to obtain the first principal component inside each cluster. By imposing realistic constraints to estimate instantaneous effects between the variables, the instantaneous interactions matrix and, consequently, the extended multivariate autoregressive (eMVAR) model were estimated. Then, extended partial directed coherences (ePDCs) were extracted as connectivity features. The mRMR algorithm was utilized to reduce the feature dimension, and finally, the selected features were imported into a deep neural network for classification between healthy and schizophrenic states. The results showed that the eMVAR model outperformed the strictly causal model in classifying schizophrenic patients. With eMVAR modeling, an accuracy of 91.11% was obtained by using only four features. Furthermore, the most discriminative connectivity feature was ePDC from left posterior (LP) to (LP), and the most informative frequency band was the gamma sub-band. We have therefore presented evidence that the proposed approach enhances the characterization and diagnosis of schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→