Modeling of Creep in Refractory Lining in Anode Baking Furnaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Refractory flue walls in anode baking furnaces are exposed to harsh conditions during operation, affecting the structural properties of the material. The flue walls in industrial furnaces degrade over time to the point where they no longer perform as intended and must be replaced. Earlier studies of spent refractory lining from anode baking furnaces have shown considerable densification of the flue wall bricks, where the densification varies significantly from the anode side to the flue side of the brick. The observed densification is proposed to be caused by high-temperature creep, and the aim of this work was to determine whether the uneven densification across the brick could be modeled using a finite element method (FEM) implementing high-temperature steady-state creep. Finite element modeling was used to model steady-state creep for a material similar to that used in the baking furnace. Thermal and physical parameters and boundary conditions were chosen to simulate the conditions in an anode baking furnace. Refractory samples of pristine and spent lining from the baking furnace were also analyzed with X-ray computed tomography (CT), with a reduction in the porosity confirming the densification during operation. The FEM modeling demonstrated that high-temperature creep could explain the observed densification in the spent flue walls. The present findings may be useful in relation to increasing the lifetime of industrial flue walls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it