RORA-neurodevelopmental disorder: A unique triad of developmental disabilities, cerebellar anomalies, and myoclonic seizures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: RORA encodes the RAR-related orphan receptor-α, playing a pivotal role in cerebellar maturation and function. Here, we report the largest series of individuals with RORA-related-neurodevelopmental disorder. METHODS: Forty individuals (30 unrelated; 10 siblings from 4 families) carrying RORA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were collected through an international collaboration. RESULTS: The 33 variants (29 de novo, 4 inherited, and 1 shared), identified by genome/exome sequencing (n = 21), chromosomal microarray analysis (n = 7), or gene panels (n = 4), included frameshift (n = 18/33), missense (n = 9/33), and stop codon (n = 6/33). Developmental disability (n = 32/37), intellectual disability (n = 22/32), and cerebellar signs (n = 25/34) were the most striking clinical features. Cerebellar symptoms were divided into early-onset, late-onset, and progressive subgroups. Cerebellar hypoplasia, atrophy, or both (n = 16/25) were more frequent in individuals with missense variants in the DNA-binding domain. Epilepsy (n = 18/38), with prominent myoclonic seizure types (n = 11/18), was classified in (1) genetic generalized epilepsy (n = 10/18) with a syndromic diagnosis identifiable for 6: epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (n = 5/6) and epilepsy with myoclonic absence (n = 1/6); (2) developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (n = 5/18); and (3) unclassified (n = 3/18). A participant with rapid deterioration of visual acuity and cone/rod dystrophy was reported. CONCLUSION: Missense variants in DNA-binding domain correlate to a more severe cerebellar phenotype. The RORA-related-neurodevelopmental disorder triad comprises developmental disability, cerebellar features, and a spectrum of myoclonic epilepsy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".