MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405500381 · doi:10.1002/mdc3.14305

A Call for Change: Updating the Operational Definition for Dementia in Parkinson's Disease

2024· article· en· W4405500381 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaime Kulisevsky, Irene Litvan, Daniel Weintraub, Jennifer G. Goldman, Alexander I. Tröster, Simon J.G. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades NeurodegenerativasAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaNational Institutes of HealthGeneralitat de CatalunyaParkinson's FoundationCHDI FoundationInternational Parkinson and Movement Disorder SocietyUniversity of PennsylvaniaU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsDementiaParkinson's diseaseDiseaseMedicinePsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.237
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.361
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2370.361
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0100.009
Science and technology studies0.0060.027
Scholarly communication0.0180.048
Open science0.0200.013
Research integrity0.0160.052
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement Disorders Clinical PracticeSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207