MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405521075 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3519562

A Digital Realization of Calcium Movement in the Cellular Bouton

2024· article· en· W4405521075 on OpenAlexafffund
Mitra Rahmatinezhad, Arash Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRealization (probability)CalciumMovement (music)Computer scienceChemistryPhysicsMathematicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modeling, analyzing, and simulating biological neural networks have attracted significant interest because of their wide-ranging applications in neuroscience and computational systems. Understanding and replicating the intricate behavior of biological components, such as calcium dynamics in the synaptic bouton, is crucial for advancing our understanding of synaptic plasticity, neural signaling, and the underlying mechanisms of learning and memory. However, accurately capturing the complex non-linear behavior of these networks, especially at the cellular level, remains a significant challenge due to the interplay of various biochemical processes. In this work, we focus on calcium movement within the synaptic bouton and introduce a novel approach for implementing these dynamics, providing an efficient solution for digital hardware realization. The proposed model leverages a high-precision method to effectively compute the nonlinear components of cellular equations while ensuring compatibility with digital hardware such as FPGA platforms. Experimental simulations and FPGA-based hardware synthesis demonstrate that the enhanced model closely replicates the intricate dynamics of intracellular calcium signaling. This approach offers a reliable, scalable, and computationally efficient tool for further exploration of neural processes, supporting applications ranging from biological modeling to neuromorphic engineering and biologically inspired computing architectures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207