MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405523450 · doi:10.1186/s12916-024-03817-x

Coffee consumption and adverse cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation

2024· article· en· W4405523450 on OpenAlexaff
Vasco Iten, Elena Herber, Michael Coslovsky, Elisa Hennings, Rebecca E. Paladini, Tobias Reichlin, Nicolas Rodondi, Andreas S. Müller, Annina Stauber, Jürg H. Beer, Roman Brenner, Giulio Conte, Richard Kobza, Marcello Di Valentino, Pierino Alvarez Bedoya, Tim Sinnecker, Leo H. Bonati, Michael Kühne, Stefan Osswald, David Conen, Stefanie Aeschbacher, Christine S. Zuern

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoffee research and impacts
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungFoundation for Cardiovascular ResearchSanofiSchweizerische HerzstiftungUniversität BaselBristol-Myers SquibbDaiichi-SankyoPfizerNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMaceMedicineHazard ratioAtrial fibrillationProportional hazards modelInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionConfidence intervalConfoundingClinical endpointPopulationProspective cohort studyCohort studyCardiologyHeart failureLower riskRandomized controlled trialEnvironmental healthPercutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There is some evidence of reduced major cardiovascular event (MACE) rates associated with moderate coffee consumption in the general population. However, there is concern about the potential risks of coffee consumption in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between coffee consumption and MACE in AF patients. METHODS: Data of patients with documented AF enrolled in two large prospective observational multicenter cohort studies (Swiss-AF and Beat-AF) were analyzed. Follow-up information was obtained on a yearly basis. Coffee consumption was categorized into two main groups: "daily" and "not-daily" coffee consumers as well as additional subcategories. The primary endpoint was MACE, defined as a composite of stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for acute heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary endpoints were the individual components of MACE and all-cause mortality. We performed time-updated multivariable adjusted Cox regression analyses to investigate the association between coffee consumption and MACE. RESULTS: The incidence rate for MACE was 5.09 per 100 person-years (py) in daily and 7.49 per 100 py in not-daily consumers (median follow-up duration: 4.7 years). After adjustment for pre-selected confounding variables, daily coffee consumption was associated with a 23% lower hazard for MACE compared to not-daily consumption (hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) 0.77 (0.66; 0.89)). Patients with moderate coffee consumption (2-3 cups/day) had the lowest hazard for MACE compared to patients with not-daily coffee consumption (HR (95% CI) 0.74 (0.63; 0.87)). CONCLUSIONS: In a population of AF patients, daily coffee consumption was associated with a reduced risk for MACE, hospitalization for acute heart failure, and all-cause mortality. The results were inconclusive for stroke or systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. In this analysis, we found no evidence of an unfavourable association of daily coffee consumption in AF Patients with adverse outcome events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02105844.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC MedicineSame topicCoffee research and impactsFrench-language works237,207