Bibliographic record
Abstract
We construct a left semi-model category of “marked strict ∞-categories” for which the fibrant objects are those whose marked arrows satisfy natural closure properties and are invertible up to higher marked arrows. The canonical model structure on strict ∞-categories can be recovered as a left Bousfield localization of this model structure. We show that an appropriate extension of the Street nerve to the marked setting produces a Quillen adjunction between our model category and the Verity model structure for complicial sets, generalizing previous results by the second named author. Finally, we use this model structure to study, in the setting of strict ∞-categories, the idea that, because they are two different “truncation functors” taking an ( ∞ , n ) to an ( ∞ , n − 1 ) -category, there are two non-equivalent definitions for the ( ∞ , 1 ) -category of ( ∞ , ∞ ) -categories as a limit of the ( ∞ , 1 ) -categories of ( ∞ , n ) -categories. We show that in fact there seem to be at least three non-equivalent ways of constructing an ( ∞ , 1 ) -category of ( ∞ , ∞ ) -categories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".