MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405535819 · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122461

Tree rings reveal mixtures of aspen and spruce exhibit greater drought resilience in a planted field experiment

2024· article· en· W4405535819 on OpenAlexafffund
Jéssica Chaves Cardoso, Linhao Wu, Marcel Schneider, Charles A. Nock

Bibliographic record

VenueForest Ecology and Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersForest Resource Improvement Association of AlbertaAlberta-Pacific Forest IndustriesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWeyerhaeuser Company
KeywordsResilience (materials science)Tree (set theory)Environmental scienceAgroforestryField (mathematics)Woody plantPicea engelmanniiDrought stressEcologyForestryAgronomyBiologyGeographyMathematicsMaterials sciencePinus contorta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boreal forests provide a wealth of ecosystem services, many of which are linked to forest productivity. Climate change is expected to increase the frequency, duration, and severity of drought, and undermine the productivity of western boreal forests. Favouring species mixtures has emerged as a potential strategy to increase forest resilience to drought. To test the hypothesis that mixtures of trembling aspen and white spruce were more productive than pure stands because they were more resistant and resilient to drought, we analyzed community and species responses to drought utilizing measurements of annual growth obtained from stem disc samples from a planted field experiment. The experiment, established in 1999, included pure aspen, aspen dominated mixtures, equal mixtures, spruce dominated mixtures, and pure spruce in a randomized block design. In 2020, trees were harvested, and annual basal area increment was estimated from measurements of stem discs. We retrospectively studied the response of productivity to strong droughts in 2009 and 2015 by defining pre- and post-drought growth periods, and calculating drought resistance (drought / pre-drought) and resilience (post-drought / pre-drought). Our results support the hypothesis that mixtures are both more productive and resilient to drought than pure stands. Composition significantly influenced the three resilience components for spruce, but effects on aspen were limited. Community mortality was greatest in pure spruce, followed by pure aspen. For mixtures, community productivity increased with the proportion of spruce; and pure spruce exhibited the lowest basal area, with less than half the basal area value than the other compositions. These findings indicate that overall favouring mixed stands is a more suitable strategy for enhancing forest resilience to drought. These results provide insight into the importance of managing aspen-spruce mixtures under expected drought as a result of climate change. • We analyzed species and community responses to drought in a field experiment. • Productivity in aspen-spruce mixtures was greater than in pure stands. • Mixtures generally performed better than pure stands during drought periods. • Mortality was greatest in pure stands. • The study supports mixed-species planting for climate change adaptation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForest Ecology and ManagementSame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207