MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405540996 · doi:10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100170

Predictive analysis of clinical features for HPV status in oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma: A machine learning approach with explainability

2024· article· en· W4405540996 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
FundersErasmus+Agència per a la Competitivitat de l’EmpresaInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaGeneralitat de CatalunyaEuropean Commission
KeywordsBasal cellMedicineOncologyArtificial intelligenceDermatologyInternal medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objective: Oropharynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OPSCC) linked to Human Papillomavirus (HPV) exhibits a more favorable prognosis than other squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Finding reliable non-invasive detection methods of this prognostic entity is key to propose appropriate therapeutic decisions. This study aims to provide a comprehensive method based on pre-treatment clinical data for predicting the patient’s HPV status over a large OPSCC patient cohort and employing explainability techniques to interpret the significance and effects of the features. Materials and Methods: We employed the RADCURE dataset clinical information to train six Machine Learning algorithms, evaluating them via cross-validation for grid search hyper-parameter tuning and feature selection as well as a final performance measurement on a 20% sample test set. For explainability, SHAP and LIME were used to identify the most relevant relationships and their effect on the predictive model. Furthermore, additional publicly available datasets were scrutinized to compare outcomes and assess the method’s generalization across diverse feature sets and populations. Results: The best model yielded an AUC of 0.85, a sensitivity of 0.83, and a specificity of 0.75 over the testing set. The explainability analysis highlighted the remarkable significance of specific clinical attributes, in particular the oropharynx subsite tumor location and the patient’s smoking history. The contribution of each variable to the prediction was substantiated by creating a 95% confidence intervals of model coefficients by means of a 10,000 sample bootstrap and by analyzing top contributors across the best-performing models. Conclusions: The combination of specific clinical factors typically collected for OPSCC patients, such as smoking habits and the tumor oropharynx sub-location, along with the ML models hereby presented, can by themselves provide an informed analysis of the HPV status, and of proper use of data science techniques to explain it. Future work should focus on adding other data modalities such as CT scans to enhance performance and to uncover new relations, thus aiding medical practitioners in diagnosing OPSCC more accurately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.812

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it