MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405543853 · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-06393-9

The impact of a coach-guided personalized depression risk communication program on the risk of major depressive episode: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2024· article· en· W4405543853 on OpenAlexafffund
JianLi Wang, Cindy Feng, Mohammad Hajizadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Psychiatry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCanadian Bioethics SocietyDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialMajor depressive episodeDepression (economics)Mental healthAnxietyIntervention (counseling)PsychiatryRisk assessmentPoison controlMedicinePsychologyClinical psychologyMedical emergencyComputer securityMood

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Depression is a highly prevalent and disabling mental health problem. Self-help has been strongly advocated for dealing with depression. Built upon the research on risk prediction modeling and risk communication, we developed a coach-guided, personalized depression risk communication tool (PDRC) for sharing information about individualized depression risk and evidence-based self-help strategies. The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the impact of the PDRC on the 12-month risk of major depressive episode (MDE) in Canadians who are at high risk of MDE. METHODS: This is an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two arms. We will recruit 500 males and 500 females in the communities across the country. Individuals are eligible, if they: (1) are 18 years or older, (2) have not had a depressive episode in the past two months, (3) are at high risk of MDE based on the sex-specific risk predictive algorithms for MDE (predicted risk of 6.5% + for men and of 11.2% + for women), (4) can communicate in either English or French, and (5) agree to be contacted for follow-up interviews. After screening and baseline assessment, participants will be randomized by sex into intervention and control group in a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the intervention group will receive the coach-guided PDRC. The participants are assessed at baseline, 3 and 12 months via computer assisted telephone interview system, regarding the presence of MDE, depressive and anxiety symptoms, use of self-help strategies, mental health services use and self-efficacy. DISCUSSION: The coach-guided PDRC may empower users to actively engage in self-management, leading to reduced risk of MDE. If successful, the coach-guided PDRC will lead to a novel selective prevention program that is closely aligned with the tiered mental health services model, contributing to early prevention of depression and better mental health wellbeing. DATE OF TRIAL REGISTRATION: 2024-10-02. PROTOCOL VERSION AND DATE: December 6, 2024. Version #1. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06619366.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.421 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PsychiatrySame topicDigital Mental Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207