Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Reviews / Comptes rendus Fabio PARASECOLI,Gastronativism: Food, Identity, Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 2022), 248 pp, ISBN 978-0-231-20207-7, reviewed by Ronald Ranta Francesca ARENA,Véronique DASEN,Yasmina FOEHR-JANSSENS,Irene MAFFI,Daniela SOLFAROLI CAMILLOCCI(dir.),Allaiter de l’Antiquité à nos jours (Turnhout : Brepols, 2022), 989 pp, ISBN 978-2-503-59652-5, reviewed by Didier Lett Jean TRINQUIER,Pierre SCHNEIDER,Le poivre, fragments d’histoire globale. Circulations et consommations, de l’Antiquité à l’époque moderne (Paris: Hermann, 2022), 256 pp, ISBN 979-1-037-01674-4, reviewed by Paul Freedman Alexandra KOVACS,Refuser la nourriture carnée. Végétarisme et pratiques civiques en Grèce ancienne (Bordeaux: Ausonius, 2022), 277 pp, ISBN 978-2-356-13521-6, reviewed by Fernando Notario Pacheco Laura M. BANDUCCI,Foodways in Roman Republican Italy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2021), 349 pp, ISBN 978-0-472-13230-0, reviewed by Emmanuel Botte Nicolas RADUGET,Histoire des vins de l’AOC Touraine, préface d’Éric Yung (La Crèche : La Geste, 2022), 296 pp, ISBN 979-1-035-31866-6, reviewed by Olivier Jacquet David MICHON,24 heures de la vie d’un restaurant. Paris, 1867 (Paris: PUF, 2022), 169 pp, ISBN 978-2-12-083313-0, reviewed by Martin Bruegel Diana GARVIN,Feeding Fascism. The Politics of Women’s Food Work (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022), 292 pp, ISBN: 978-1-487-52818-8, reviewed by Alessandra Gissi Albena SHKODROVA,Rebellious Cooks and Recipe Writing in Communist Bulgaria. Food in Modern History: Traditions and Innovations (London/ New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021), ix + 188 pp, ISBN 978-1-3501-3230-6, reviewed by Maria Kapkan Ronald RANTA,Alejandro COLÁS,Daniel MONTERESCU (eds),“Going Native?” Settler Colonialism and Food (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), 277 pp, ISBN 978-3-030-96267-8, reviewed by Amy Cox Hall
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".