"He is sent to this place, and good will result to the cause of God": Young Richard Preston, Race, and Religion in Early-19th-Century Nova Scotia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Le révérend Richard Preston (v. 1791-1861) occupe une grande place dans l'histoire de la communauté africaine néo-écossaise pour son rôle en tant que pasteur, abolitionniste, organisateur communautaire et fondateur de la African Baptist Association. Durant un épisode largement oublié de sa carrière à ses débuts, Preston prêchait dans la vallée de l'Annapolis, où il fut à l'origine d'un vaste renouveau religieux en 1823-1824. Contrairement à la majeure partie de son ministère ultérieur, Preston y prêchait devant des auditoires composés exclusivement ou principalement de Blancs. Ses prédications suscitaient des réactions très diverses, allant de la curiosité à la conversion jusqu'aux préjugés insidieux et à l'hostilité pure et simple, qui étaient l'expression des relations complexes entre la race et la religion dans la Nouvelle-Écosse du début du 19e siècle. Abstract: Reverend Richard Preston (c. 1791-1861), formerly enslaved in Virginia, looms large in African Nova Scotian history for his role as a pastor, abolitionist, community organizer, and founder of the African Baptist Association. During a largely forgotten early episode in his career, in 1823-1824, Preston preached in the Annapolis Valley and sparked an extensive religious revival. Unlike much of his later public ministry, Preston preached to racially integrated or predominantly white audiences. His ministry elicited a range of responses, from curiosity and conversion to insidious prejudice and outright hostility, conveying the complex relationships between race and religion in early-19th-century Nova Scotia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".