Trophic magnification rates of eighteen trace elements in freshwater food webs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trace elements play diverse roles in animal physiology ranging from essential micronutrients to potent toxicants. Despite animals accumulating many trace elements through their diets, relationships between trophic positions and biological concentrations of most trace elements remain poorly described. We report trophic transfer rates of Al, As, Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Se, Sr, Ti, Tl, U, V, and Zn from 31 freshwaters located in distinct biogeographic regions. Elemental concentrations and stable nitrogen isotope ratios (proxies for trophic position) were determined in zooplankton, molluscs, insects, and fishes from all sites. Trophic magnification factors (TMFs) were calculated as the mean fraction of each element that transferred from prey to predators at each site. TMFs >1 indicate biomagnification and TMFs <1 indicate biodilution. Mercury was the only biomagnifying element (median TMF = 3.77), and selenium neither biomagnified nor biodiluted (median TMF = 1.01). All 16 remaining elements biodiluted, with median TMFs ranging from 0.07 (uranium) to 0.60 (thallium). We used a model selection procedure to determine whether intrinsic physical and chemical elemental properties explained differences in TMFs among elements. Elements with high covalent bonding indices ( Q ) had marginally greater TMFs than elements with low Q values. Based on their high Q values, we recommend investigation into the trophic transfer rates of ten additional trace elements, some of which may biomagnify through some aquatic food webs. The high variability in TMFs within elements suggests that ecological factors are likely more important than intrinsic elemental properties at determining elemental TMFs. • We sampled 31 extremely diverse lake and stream food webs across North and South America. • Trophic magnification rates vary tremendously both within and among elements. • Trophic magnification rates correlate positively with elemental covalent indices. • Nutritional essentiality did not affect elemental trophic magnification rates. • We identify ten additional elements whose covalent bonding indices suggest their potential to biomagnify, warranting future investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".