LEGAL SYSTEMS OF A GENERAL TYPE: AN UPDATED LOOK AT TYPOLOGY AND IDENTIFICATION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The transformation of the world legal order necessitates a deeper understanding of legal phenomena in the context of modern realities (in particular, national and interstate legal systems); carrying out typology of legal systems and their identification with the corresponding type; clarification of the state of their functioning, as well as trends and development prospects. One of the types of modern legal systems in the world is the common (Anglo-American) system. The objects of this study were the legal systems of England and Wales, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States of America. The purpose of this publication is to investigate the above-mentioned legal systems of a general type, highlighting such cognitive structures as “identification code of the legal system” and “indicator of the functioning and development of the legal system”; confirm their identification with the Anglo-American type; to identify the state of functioning and development; form conclusions about trends and prospects. The tasks that made it possible to achieve the specified goal were: analysis of scientific sources; publications in mass media (in the context of the subject of research), official documents, in particular sources of law and other legal acts in legal systems of the Anglo-American type, which is the object of research; creation of an empirical basis for the application of such cognitive structures as “identification code of the legal system” and “indicator of the functioning and development of the legal system”; identification of typical indicators, indicators of permissible deviations, interaction of these national legal systems with interstate legal systems, as well as trends in the development of a regressive and progressive state, development prospects. These constructions made it possible to identify deformations and forms or to form ways to overcome them. In the process of research, sociological methodology was used, in particular the techniques of document analysis. This made it possible to analyze a significant number of official documents: laws and other sources of law of legal systems of a general type; scientific sources; publications in mass media, etc. within the scope of the research subject, as well as to create an empirical basis for the application of general theoretical, comparative and legal methodology, technical and legal analysis using concepts and constructions of industry methodology (science of constitutional law, international law, procedural law, etc.) . In the legal systems that were the object of the study, stability in typical indicators was found. It was also established that the indicators of permissible deviations are aimed at ensuring this stability, and this gives grounds to conclude about the possibility of the evolutionary transition of legal systems of this type to the future new legal form.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it