Airway Remodeling in Cystic Fibrosis Is Heterogeneous
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Rationale Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by bronchiectasis on imaging, while functionally evolving toward obstructive impairment. Despite its assumed importance in CF, small airway remodeling and its relation to bronchiectasis remains poorly understood. Objectives The aim of our study was to explore both large and small airway disease morphometrically, by using detailed imaging techniques, such as ex vivo high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and micro–computed tomography (μCT), and histological analysis in advanced CF. Methods On HRCT (600 μm; CF, n = 21; control, n = 6) and μCT (150 μm; CF, n = 3; control, n = 1) scans of inflated explanted lungs, the ratio of visible airway volume to total lung volume (AV%) was calculated as a marker of bronchiectasis, while airway segmentation was used for generation analysis. Clinical data were retrospectively collected. On μCT (8.5 μm) images of lung cores (±2.8 cm3), extracted randomly from each lobe (three per lobe), distal airway (DA) diameter, number of airway collapses, and number of open terminal bronchioles per milliliter were analyzed. Morphometric analysis was supplemented with histological analysis of DA collapse. Results AV% on HRCT was heterogeneous among CF lungs (0.7–4.6%), overlapping with controls (0.4–1.2%). However, the pattern of airway loss on μCT was homogeneous among CF lungs and most pronounced from generations 9–16. AV% did not correlate with the number of open terminal bronchioles per milliliter or percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, which correlated with each other. Open DAs in CF lungs were narrowed compared with DA in controls. On the other hand, collapsed DAs in CF lungs showed varying degrees of proximal dilation, with DA diameter correlating with AV%. On histology, collapsed CF DAs showed constrictive bronchiolitis. Conclusions Airway remodeling in end-stage CF is heterogeneous, ranging from minimal bronchiectasis, overlapping with control lungs, to extensive bronchiectasis with small airway dilation. However, the degree of bronchiectasis is unrelated to functional impairment or the amount of small airway loss, underscoring the importance of small airway disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".