MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405600230 · doi:10.2196/68002

Spatiotemporal Trends in Deaths From External Causes in Brazil: 23-Year Ecological and Population-Based Study

2024· article· en· W4405600230 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lucas Almeida Andrade, Wandklebson Silva da Paz, Luís Ricardo Santos de Melo, Débora dos Santos Tavares, Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa, Emerson Lucas Silva Camargo, Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura, Regina Cláudia da Silva Souza, Karina Conceição Gomes Machado de Araújo, Carlos Dornels Freire de Souza, Allan Dantas dos Santos, Fagner Alfredo Ardisson Cirino Campos, Márcio Bezerra‐Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreprintPanoramaGeographyEcologyPopulationSeries (stratigraphy)BiologyEnvironmental healthMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Mortality from external causes is a major public health issue globally, with significant impacts on both lives and economies. In Brazil, external cause mortality has shown spatiotemporal variations across regions, influenced by social, economic, and demographic factors. Objective: This study aimed to examine the spatiotemporal dynamics of mortality from external causes in Brazil for 23 years (2000-2022), identifying patterns across regions and demographic groups and assessing the major contributing causes of death. Methods: This ecological study used data from the Brazilian Mortality Information System (SIM) and used joinpoint regression to analyze temporal trends, Moran I for spatial analysis, and Poisson scanning statistics for spatiotemporal patterns. A total of 3,240,023 deaths were analyzed, with specific attention given to regional and demographic disparities. Results: The study found that mortality from external causes remained significant, with men and young adults (20-39 years) having the highest rates of death. The main causes of death were assaults (36.61%), transport accidents (26.55%), falls (7.83%), and self-harm (7.43%). Despite an overall decrease in mortality, increases were observed in the North and Northeast regions and among the older adults. High-risk areas were predominantly located in the North, Northeast, and Central-West regions. The mortality trends varied by region, with significant differences in risk across the country. Conclusions: Although there was a general reduction in mortality from external causes in Brazil, this trend was not uniform across all regions. The North, Northeast, and Central-West regions showed the highest mortality risks, with men and young adults being the most affected demographic groups. These findings emphasize the need for targeted public health interventions that address the regional and demographic disparities in mortality from external causes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Public Health and SurveillanceSame topicMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareFrench-language works237,207