Spatiotemporal Trends in Deaths From External Causes in Brazil: 23-Year Ecological and Population-Based Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Mortality from external causes is a major public health issue globally, with significant impacts on both lives and economies. In Brazil, external cause mortality has shown spatiotemporal variations across regions, influenced by social, economic, and demographic factors. Objective: This study aimed to examine the spatiotemporal dynamics of mortality from external causes in Brazil for 23 years (2000-2022), identifying patterns across regions and demographic groups and assessing the major contributing causes of death. Methods: This ecological study used data from the Brazilian Mortality Information System (SIM) and used joinpoint regression to analyze temporal trends, Moran I for spatial analysis, and Poisson scanning statistics for spatiotemporal patterns. A total of 3,240,023 deaths were analyzed, with specific attention given to regional and demographic disparities. Results: The study found that mortality from external causes remained significant, with men and young adults (20-39 years) having the highest rates of death. The main causes of death were assaults (36.61%), transport accidents (26.55%), falls (7.83%), and self-harm (7.43%). Despite an overall decrease in mortality, increases were observed in the North and Northeast regions and among the older adults. High-risk areas were predominantly located in the North, Northeast, and Central-West regions. The mortality trends varied by region, with significant differences in risk across the country. Conclusions: Although there was a general reduction in mortality from external causes in Brazil, this trend was not uniform across all regions. The North, Northeast, and Central-West regions showed the highest mortality risks, with men and young adults being the most affected demographic groups. These findings emphasize the need for targeted public health interventions that address the regional and demographic disparities in mortality from external causes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".