Building Privacy-Preserving Medical Text Models With a Pretrained Transformer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid advancement of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare heightens the urgency for accurate medical text sentiment analysis. The privacy protection of medical data has been a crucial concern due to its sensitivity. The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) facilitates large-scale data collection at lower cost, enabling precision medicine. However, decentralized IoMT poses novel challenges to centralized standard encryption schemes. In this article, we propose a novel approach to building privacy-preserving sentiment models with a generative pretrained transformer (GPT). We first convert sensitive medical text data into noise-like and distributed one-hot images. Then, we introduce visual cryptography (VC) for lightweight and secure transmission of medical text across public networks in resource-limited IoMT devices. We adopt a cross-domain sentiment analysis framework that finetunes transformer-based language models for accurate sentiment analysis instead of training GPT in sentiment analysis from scratch. Experimental results show that the proposed approach improves the accuracy and effectiveness of sentiment analysis while maintaining privacy, thereby addressing a significant gap in biomedical text analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it