MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405612149 · doi:10.1016/j.redare.2024.501660

Detecting occult hemorrhage bleeding using a new protocol called the UFOH protocol: Ultrasound Focused Occult Hemorrhage

2024· article· es· W4405612149 on OpenAlexaff
D. González-Delgado, Alex Martínez‐Martí, Jordi Mercadal, Gregorio Romero‐González, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Marı́a Santacana

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition) · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal Trauma and Injuries
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOccultMedicineRadiologyProtocol (science)Retroperitoneal hemorrhageSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Point-of-care abdominal ultrasound (US) has emerged as a powerful tool for clinicians and is becoming a routine bedside tool to rapidly diagnose, manage hemodynamics, monitor fluid status, and guide procedures in emergency and critical care. Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST), is commonly used to detect free intraperitoneal blood in the trauma setting and may also be an option in non-trauma patients. However, it has significant limitations for detecting gastrointestinal or retroperitoneal bleeding. To date, there is no US protocol described for the diagnosis of occult bleeding in the retroperitoneal space. We describe a new US protocol called “Ultrasound For Occult Hemorrhage” (UFOH) for a fast diagnosis of occult hemorrhage. The UFOH protocol is a novel ultrasound-guided approach designed to detect occult bleeding in various clinical settings, including emergency department, intensive care and perioperative environment. La ecografía abdominal como «point of care», en el punto de atención, ha surgido como una herramienta potente para los clínicos, habiéndose convertido en una herramienta rutinaria a pie de cama para diagnosticar, manejar la hemodinámica, supervisar el estado de los líquidos y guiar los procedimientos de urgencias y cuidados críticos. Se utiliza comúnmente Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma para detectar sangre libre intra-peritoneal en el ámbito traumático, pudiendo ser también una opción en los pacientes no traumáticos. Sin embargo, tiene limitaciones significativas para la detección de la hemorragia gastrointestinal o retroperitoneal. Hasta la fecha, no existe ningún protocolo ecográfico des-crito para el diagnóstico de la hemorragia oculta en el espacio retroperitoneal. Describimos un nuevo protocolo ecográfico denominado Ultrasound For Occult Hemorrhage para el diagnóstico rápido de la hemorragia oculta. Dicho protocolo es un nuevo enfoque ecográfico diseñado para detectar el sangrado oculto en diversos ámbitos clínicos, incluyendo los servicios de urgencias, cuidados intensivos y el entorno perioperatorio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación (English Edition)Same topicAbdominal Trauma and InjuriesFrench-language works237,207