MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405624724 · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ada248

Machine learning configuration-dependent friction tensors in Langevin heatbaths

2024· article· en· W4405624724 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthias Sachs, Wojciech G. Stark, Reinhard J. Maurer, Christoph Ortner

Bibliographic record

VenueMachine Learning Science and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of WarwickLeverhulme TrustUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsHomogeneous spaceFormalism (music)Langevin equationTensor (intrinsic definition)Configuration spaceStatistical physicsEuclidean spaceClassical mechanicsPhysicsDissipationLangevin dynamicsMathematicsMathematical analysisPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dynamics of coarse-grained particle systems derived via the Mori–Zwanzig projection formalism commonly take the form of a (generalized) Langevin equation with configuration-dependent friction tensor and diffusion coefficient matrix. In this article, we introduce a class of equivariant representations of tensor-valued functions based on the Atomic Cluster Expansion framework that allows for efficient learning of such configuration-dependent friction tensors from data. Besides satisfying the correct equivariance properties with respect to the Euclidean group E(3), the resulting heat bath models satisfy a fluctuation-dissipation relation. We demonstrate the capabilities of the model approach by fitting a model of configuration-dependent tensorial electronic friction calculated from first principles that arises during reactive molecular dynamics at metal surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMachine Learning Science and TechnologySame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207