MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405625251 · doi:10.1016/s2352-4642(24)00303-1

Building global collaborative research networks in paediatric critical care: a roadmap

2024· review· en· W4405625251 on OpenAlexaff
Luregn J. Schlapbach, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan, Kristen S Gibbons, Natalie Napolitano, Lyvonne N. Tume, Andrew C. Argent, Akash Deep, Jan Hau Lee, Mark Peters, Michael S. D. Agus, John Adabie Appiah, Jennifer Armstrong, Tigist Bacha, Warwick Butt, Daniela Carla de Souza, Jaime Fernández‐Sarmiento, Heidi R. Flori, Patricia Fontela, Ben Gelbart, Sebastián González‐Dambrauskas, Takanari Ikeyama, Roberto Jabornisky, Muralidharan Jayashree, Yasser Kazzaz, Martin C. J. Kneyber, Debbie Long, Jenala Njirimmadzi, Rujipat Samransamruajkit, Roelie M. Wösten‐van Asperen, Quan Wang, Katie O’Hearn, Kusum Menon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Child & Adolescent Health · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersNational Medical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research CouncilUniversität ZürichAcademy of Medical SciencesMurdoch Children's Research InstituteNOMIS StiftungThrasher Research Fund
KeywordsCritical pathwaysMEDLINEComputer scienceMedicineData scienceProcess managementBusinessPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.175
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.141
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1750.141
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.006
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0170.032
Open science0.0070.024
Research integrity0.0180.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.277
GPT teacher head0.594
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Child & Adolescent HealthSame topicDelphi Technique in ResearchFrench-language works237,207